đź“… Original date posted:2017-04-08
📝 Original message:> Please no conspiracy theory like stepping on someone’s toes. I believe
> it’s always nice to challenge the established model. However, as I’m
> trying to make some hardfork design, I intend to have a stricter UTXO
> growth limit. As you said "protocol addressing the UTXO growth, might not
> be worth considering protocol improvements*, it sounds like UTXO growth
> limit wouldn’t be very helpful for your model, which I doubt.
Thank you. I realize that this particular phrase implies that in my
design, outputs are less costly then inputs, *in total resource costs*,
which I can not defend without completely ignoring base load script
verification. I rephrased it.
Tomas
Tomas [ARCHIVE] /
npub1rs…9evk4
2023-06-07 17:59:42
in reply to nevent1q…lgpf
Author Public Key
npub1rsp4w56r24w3zv4xy8zfgesep45qmf9rq6aghxfw3wr7yemqnnwsf9evk4Published at
2023-06-07 17:59:42Event JSON
{
"id": "d7a9eab96eb5a432adf13c8e29e8805ecd78d17fef11a60bb95c589822100a83",
"pubkey": "1c03575343555d1132a621c49466190d680da4a306ba8b992e8b87e267609cdd",
"created_at": 1686160782,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d4a682be1f6603f0ff8798c52b7225cac6554e21f3aedb0c80e7d41cf71983ad",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e01ea5648608a361dbf711f5af785f10e051ab19771ba9b09935fef8f52aa1bf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"492fa402e838904bdc8eb2c8fafa1aa895df26438bfd998c71b01cb9db550ff7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-04-08\n📝 Original message:\u003e Please no conspiracy theory like stepping on someone’s toes. I believe\n\u003e it’s always nice to challenge the established model. However, as I’m\n\u003e trying to make some hardfork design, I intend to have a stricter UTXO\n\u003e growth limit. As you said \"protocol addressing the UTXO growth, might not\n\u003e be worth considering protocol improvements*, it sounds like UTXO growth\n\u003e limit wouldn’t be very helpful for your model, which I doubt. \n\nThank you. I realize that this particular phrase implies that in my\ndesign, outputs are less costly then inputs, *in total resource costs*,\nwhich I can not defend without completely ignoring base load script\nverification. I rephrased it.\n\nTomas",
"sig": "6212bde9693cdc95e13a9b61809801c89484bd85d8fe40f9964c5a2ba255d9a831c4a5901735d98f6fc7bdc18b44c4a00ddc1c21aae1cae29026898e8c706cd8"
}