📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19
📝 Original message:FYI, a few developers including Wladimir, Greg, Peter Todd, Pieter, and
Alex Morcos have been discussing what to do about improving the signal
noise ratio on bitcoin-dev list. One proposal similar to this discussion
was to split it into multiple mailing lists. It was pointed out that the
less technical Bitcoin discussion list already existed in the past and
nobody used it. Generally the discussion went away from creating yet
another mailing list and toward instituting an on-topic guidelines for
bitcoin-dev. Gavin, Wladimir, and a few of the others agreed to a simple
few paragraphs written by Alex Morcos. IIRC Wladimir agreed to post it.
Has it been posted yet?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at gmail.com> wrote:
> > bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core
> > discussion?
>
> Well -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the moment,
> and establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so
> long as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.
> The risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss
> a discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty
> low volume in any case.
>
> > As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time
> with
> > little use.
>
> I would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules for -dev
> that would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC
> we regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to
> move to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit
> chat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.
>
> We could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by
> offloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It
> just needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.
> Especially if the list already exists, we should consider making a
> decision now.
>
> Who are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use
> sourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on
> linuxfoundation?
>
> ping @Warren.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/913a23c2/attachment-0001.html>;
Warren Togami Jr. [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s5…zxem8
2023-06-07 15:48:35
in reply to nevent1q…3v3e
Author Public Key
npub1s5p2xnl52ksr3a4qfa8re5znmja46ugm3x3ayy0x2c2mqrsw6ewsmzxem8Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:48:35Event JSON
{
"id": "522fef3cdfde5717187f750f28a9bee6dd27f0c5dbbd2aa12395a571fda8fd9a",
"pubkey": "8502a34ff455a038f6a04f4e3cd053dcbb5d711b89a3d211e65615b00e0ed65d",
"created_at": 1686152915,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6d8bf3bf9c9288a662e30ce6a50c0e20b9e8667919000962eeb0bb272d11a195",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d29f74dfa1ef61fa3fc29b3f1e2df1aab9fd32811d80fa644cd265b4ecd2c7db",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19\n📝 Original message:FYI, a few developers including Wladimir, Greg, Peter Todd, Pieter, and\nAlex Morcos have been discussing what to do about improving the signal\nnoise ratio on bitcoin-dev list. One proposal similar to this discussion\nwas to split it into multiple mailing lists. It was pointed out that the\nless technical Bitcoin discussion list already existed in the past and\nnobody used it. Generally the discussion went away from creating yet\nanother mailing list and toward instituting an on-topic guidelines for\nbitcoin-dev. Gavin, Wladimir, and a few of the others agreed to a simple\nfew paragraphs written by Alex Morcos. IIRC Wladimir agreed to post it.\nHas it been posted yet?\n\nOn Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev for protocol discussion and bitcoin-core for Bitcoin Core\n\u003e \u003e discussion?\n\u003e\n\u003e Well -dev or both, I dont particularly see a difference at the moment,\n\u003e and establishing two lists isnt really going to make a difference so\n\u003e long as Bitcoin Core is the reference client, which it is by defacto.\n\u003e The risk of having too many lists is interested stakeholders will miss\n\u003e a discussions. Normal protocol and core discussions are usually pretty\n\u003e low volume in any case.\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e As Jorge notes, a general discussion list has existed for a long time\n\u003e with\n\u003e \u003e little use.\n\u003e\n\u003e I would suggest it's only because there havent been any rules for -dev\n\u003e that would force general discussion over to the bitcoin list. On IRC\n\u003e we regularly tell people in #bitcoin-dev they are OT and ask them to\n\u003e move to #bitcoin and as a result, -dev remains quite clear of chit\n\u003e chat, #bitcoin has a steady stream of general chatter.\n\u003e\n\u003e We could reduce the OT/noise of bitcoin-dev list considerably by\n\u003e offloading the non-technical/academic debate to the bitcoin list. It\n\u003e just needs a bit of shepherding. I am more than happy to help out.\n\u003e Especially if the list already exists, we should consider making a\n\u003e decision now.\n\u003e\n\u003e Who are the moderators for that list? Do we really want to use\n\u003e sourceforge or are there alternatives, like another list on\n\u003e linuxfoundation?\n\u003e\n\u003e ping @Warren.\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/913a23c2/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "6ed77ff32a76dd0de77eec10627e3b50624ab29ebd63ab104edff4eb19970e8dab0ac9ea4a1cb0c41f7a5d3bdd41e4d7cb0850d5e747bd508ce629e603819bbd"
}