📅 Original date posted:2022-03-18
📝 Original message:On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 6:25 PM Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Boker tov bitcoin devs,
I don't undesrtand what that means, sorry
>> A mechanism of soft-forking against activation exists. What more do you want?
>
>
> Agreed -- that should be enough.
No, resistance should ideally be a priori, not a posteriori.
>
>>
>> Are we supposed to write the code on behalf of this hypothetical group of users who may or may not exist for them just so that they can have a node that remains stalled on Speedy Trial lockin?
>>
>> That simply isn't reasonable, but if you think it is, I invite you to create such a fork.
>
>
> Disagree.
>
> It is a reasonable ask.
>
> I've done it in about 40 lines of python: https://github.com/jeremyrubin/forkd
>
> Merry Christmas Jorge, please vet the code carefully before running.
40 lines of python code should be easy to bet even if the author was
very bad at writing readable code and obfuscated his code on purpose.
I don't know if it's the case, because, sorry, I'm not reviewing your
code at the moment.
"Vet the code carefully before running" strikes me as arrogant and
condescending. as if you were implying my engineering capacity was
very limited. If you say these things to me publicly, I can only only
imagine what you have told other devs behind my back about my capacity
(or even my ideology) if they ever asked (or perhaps without them
asking). I really hope you haven't lied to anyone about my ideology,
J.
Perhaps I do have "prosectution complex" with you indeed. Not with
Russel, but with you.
After all, I've publicly say I don't trust you, haven't I?
But, again, what do I know about psychology?
Going back on topic, the reason I won't review your code is because
you have rushed a design before understanding the analysis.
No, I'm not asking for a stalled mechanism for speedy trial, I don't
want speedy trial.
We disagree on the analysis of the problem to solve, that's why we
disagree on the design for the solution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_development_life_cycle#Analysis
Anyway, perhaps I look at the code in the future if your proposal
consensus change seems to prosper.
Regarding "merry christmas"...what the f are you talking about? it's
not Christmas time and neither you or me are christians, are you?
If this is some sort of riddle or joke, we really must have very
different senses of humor, because I don't get it.
Come on, J, let's both try to stay on topic or people will start to
correctly point out that we both negatively discriminate each other
for offtopic reasons, be them reasonably justified or not.
> Peace,
Ama, y ensancha el alma.
> Jeremy
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 23:06:06
in reply to nevent1q…tnn2
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 23:06:06Event JSON
{
"id": "52376b6e9a9f846b7e7cfc6e0acea209f1f96fb9f661e2ecf827a060439b5f44",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686179166,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a5af5e39047c2302ef2c813ca29b2c17152d49444d282becfeb36106acf5ee47",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c1ac34d136528b4eb26f3dcd70c85e6a0f195d23ca32a1cc419d480aef87eb52",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3030ec2d70259fdd55ba8e063740c139c3daaa618f86e3fae34cebcb73c742ba"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-03-18\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 6:25 PM Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e Boker tov bitcoin devs,\n\nI don't undesrtand what that means, sorry\n\n\u003e\u003e A mechanism of soft-forking against activation exists. What more do you want?\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Agreed -- that should be enough.\n\nNo, resistance should ideally be a priori, not a posteriori.\n\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Are we supposed to write the code on behalf of this hypothetical group of users who may or may not exist for them just so that they can have a node that remains stalled on Speedy Trial lockin?\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e That simply isn't reasonable, but if you think it is, I invite you to create such a fork.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Disagree.\n\u003e\n\u003e It is a reasonable ask.\n\u003e\n\u003e I've done it in about 40 lines of python: https://github.com/jeremyrubin/forkd\n\u003e\n\u003e Merry Christmas Jorge, please vet the code carefully before running.\n\n40 lines of python code should be easy to bet even if the author was\nvery bad at writing readable code and obfuscated his code on purpose.\nI don't know if it's the case, because, sorry, I'm not reviewing your\ncode at the moment.\n\"Vet the code carefully before running\" strikes me as arrogant and\ncondescending. as if you were implying my engineering capacity was\nvery limited. If you say these things to me publicly, I can only only\nimagine what you have told other devs behind my back about my capacity\n(or even my ideology) if they ever asked (or perhaps without them\nasking). I really hope you haven't lied to anyone about my ideology,\nJ.\nPerhaps I do have \"prosectution complex\" with you indeed. Not with\nRussel, but with you.\nAfter all, I've publicly say I don't trust you, haven't I?\nBut, again, what do I know about psychology?\n\nGoing back on topic, the reason I won't review your code is because\nyou have rushed a design before understanding the analysis.\nNo, I'm not asking for a stalled mechanism for speedy trial, I don't\nwant speedy trial.\nWe disagree on the analysis of the problem to solve, that's why we\ndisagree on the design for the solution.\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_development_life_cycle#Analysis\n\nAnyway, perhaps I look at the code in the future if your proposal\nconsensus change seems to prosper.\n\nRegarding \"merry christmas\"...what the f are you talking about? it's\nnot Christmas time and neither you or me are christians, are you?\nIf this is some sort of riddle or joke, we really must have very\ndifferent senses of humor, because I don't get it.\nCome on, J, let's both try to stay on topic or people will start to\ncorrectly point out that we both negatively discriminate each other\nfor offtopic reasons, be them reasonably justified or not.\n\n\u003e Peace,\n\nAma, y ensancha el alma.\n\n\u003e Jeremy\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "18426e3b95f36e203dbed52b7d20b63c9447de0e50dc8e92ce154c677780ca957d7c454d28b394a83838cf9ef7edfb2510c85954a8aca8998e6ec12f961a77d2"
}