š
Original date posted:2015-09-03
š Original message:Hi Jeff,
Thoughts on this part of the proposal:
"Absent/invalid votes are counted as votes for the current hardLimit.
Out of range votes are counted as the nearest in-range value."
1. Why should an absent vote be considered a vote for the status quo? A
non-voter should have zero impact on the result.
2. Why should out of range votes be counted? They're an invalid vote, a
spoiled ballot as such, and thus it would be better if they were discarded.
Regards,
Simon
On 09/02/2015 08:33 PM, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> BIP 100 initial public
> draft: https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki
>
> Emphasis on "initial" This is a starting point for the usual open
> source feedback/iteration cycle, not an endpoint that Must Be This Way.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
Simon Liu [ARCHIVE] /
npub1a3ā¦r6s85
2023-06-07 17:39:23
in reply to nevent1qā¦jcp5
Author Public Key
npub1a3zpmn53lhv8jv7vjg3daletu2e6e9ce88737ga2r7dkr7yc7dss7r6s85Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 17:39:23Event JSON
{
"id": "53721b2d77e03adec8684af3bb8a33bc0571866a8d17799b3c1a1ab751dd8dfe",
"pubkey": "ec441dce91fdd87933cc9222deff2be2b3ac971939fd1f23aa1f9b61f898f361",
"created_at": 1686159563,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a137c877ff26a7c79ddcf309fc77d8729c3f5cc9c177f8e08369ded48fb80356",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cb6406ffb52035b4a7af44ce11ec8242c3d49ac12d2b6c0424239e55efd2ca70",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-09-03\nš Original message:Hi Jeff,\n\nThoughts on this part of the proposal:\n\n\"Absent/invalid votes are counted as votes for the current hardLimit.\nOut of range votes are counted as the nearest in-range value.\"\n\n1. Why should an absent vote be considered a vote for the status quo? A\nnon-voter should have zero impact on the result.\n\n2. Why should out of range votes be counted? They're an invalid vote, a\nspoiled ballot as such, and thus it would be better if they were discarded.\n\nRegards,\nSimon\n\n\nOn 09/02/2015 08:33 PM, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e BIP 100 initial public\n\u003e draft: https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki\n\u003e \n\u003e Emphasis on \"initial\" This is a starting point for the usual open\n\u003e source feedback/iteration cycle, not an endpoint that Must Be This Way.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e",
"sig": "4f835b348d3fa1b9d639b71b536652e8230f2308f9813280f17ed52965629fb6737c63d2c6546cd8a4a85b64a00799b0c83f5af8b666b7678550468df98b7255"
}