📅 Original date posted:2016-05-11
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 12:20:55 PM Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner <
> sergio.d.lerner at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You can find it here:
> > https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/the-re-design-of-the-bitcoin-blo
> > ck-header/
> >
> > Basically, the idea is to put in the first 64 bytes a 4 byte hash of the
> > second 64-byte chunk. That design also allows increased nonce space in
> > the first 64 bytes.
>
> My mistake here. I didn't recalled correctly my own idea. The idea is to
> include in the second 64-byte chunk a 4-byte hash of the first chunk, not
> the opposite.
What if we XOR bytes 64..76 with the first 12 bytes of the SHA2 midstate?
Would that work?
Luke
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 17:50:31
in reply to nevent1q…ryvh
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:50:31Event JSON
{
"id": "56136f902cbb4720de0b1b69bd73ffafd08e638f8a190d7eb682d219fa505c21",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686160231,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b74d6e3e945ee090c612026984f249efe6d61ca521fddbb0329fa69f81265a0b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"25947f9abfc9a8dbb60400e2b00191a3232f550f46c36795eee080c9fd104152",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-05-11\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 12:20:55 PM Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev \nwrote:\n\u003e On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner \u003c\n\u003e sergio.d.lerner at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e You can find it here:\n\u003e \u003e https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/the-re-design-of-the-bitcoin-blo\n\u003e \u003e ck-header/\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e Basically, the idea is to put in the first 64 bytes a 4 byte hash of the\n\u003e \u003e second 64-byte chunk. That design also allows increased nonce space in\n\u003e \u003e the first 64 bytes.\n\u003e \n\u003e My mistake here. I didn't recalled correctly my own idea. The idea is to\n\u003e include in the second 64-byte chunk a 4-byte hash of the first chunk, not\n\u003e the opposite.\n\nWhat if we XOR bytes 64..76 with the first 12 bytes of the SHA2 midstate? \nWould that work?\n\nLuke",
"sig": "5f536af2490af525461f7e82a1b529d0e31d2b3a32da4a97ae5b4d50c57e8855767e1a91b86c82898cd9e941590063e3d058ea10446414cee07ef113ebf31077"
}