Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-09-17 📝 Original message:Mark Friedenbach via ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-09-17
📝 Original message:Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
writes:
> Eric, that would be, I think, my sequencenumbers2 branch in which nSequence
> is an explicit relative lock-time field (unless the most significant bit is
> set). That has absolutely clear semantics. You should comment on #6312
> where this is being discussed.
Indeed. Simplicity wins. We have half the number space left for the
future, too. If people are paranoid, reserve the top *two* bits.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Published at
2023-06-07 17:40:42Event JSON
{
"id": "5e3709b769a3b9356bfcd3759dad3b7b6535e0e14d1c90f4951d8f7c10945496",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686159642,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5fe477206535624090ccd89b16e7648847cf7e7a4f6f91630a129cd4e6eed9a8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cd15cda44527186b8549bb669163ba458ed6b46d1e4d56a0ff6ade52872a9982",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-17\n📝 Original message:Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\nwrites:\n\u003e Eric, that would be, I think, my sequencenumbers2 branch in which nSequence\n\u003e is an explicit relative lock-time field (unless the most significant bit is\n\u003e set). That has absolutely clear semantics. You should comment on #6312\n\u003e where this is being discussed.\n\nIndeed. Simplicity wins. We have half the number space left for the\nfuture, too. If people are paranoid, reserve the top *two* bits.\n\nThanks,\nRusty.",
"sig": "47d206a08e32307d47c28ffdc174f0bec487929456bb96b87e26f90317c778d5bf9e12ac3cdb20555e422dab6498e42087755ea670b050f9b04e8f0172b5f7cc"
}