📅 Original date posted:2012-01-23
📝 Original message:> I double checked that the official (C++) client is indeed successful
> here. Oddly enough the bitcoinj implementation also seems to fail to
> verify this transaction, which seems to point in the direction of
> BouncyCastle (which we both use).
BitCoinJ does not verify signatures (it is an SPV implementation), so
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Are you using old code? There used
to be some stuff that checked signatures but it was removed some time
ago.
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 02:57:23
in reply to nevent1q…u6q2
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 02:57:23Event JSON
{
"id": "5e528b5e6d670b48eaaa0703f4f78dc66117db94134081b0be91d160b6f74b0f",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686106643,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b38bb34b55a69853b6ddad60097eabdc2fab3de87b544bb01dc0808cb0ea1c97",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"837ec28c49e1c602782bfbde90b1f164e7c4f5d34b0e798903cc355a574e0253",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f316581d354ba4c18a184836d437a078a6ac86f3042919126339b57e69906f9c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-01-23\n📝 Original message:\u003e I double checked that the official (C++) client is indeed successful\n\u003e here. Oddly enough the bitcoinj implementation also seems to fail to\n\u003e verify this transaction, which seems to point in the direction of\n\u003e BouncyCastle (which we both use).\n\nBitCoinJ does not verify signatures (it is an SPV implementation), so\nI'm not sure what you mean by this. Are you using old code? There used\nto be some stuff that checked signatures but it was removed some time\nago.",
"sig": "7e26392edb32fa4ffc7415734895683534fb07fb0c7faffa7cecdb96b40c447cd7f3ab3ceac50c1ba8324eba7b34627d44c76cc28fb3f424ea6948d0ef024ac4"
}