š
Original date posted:2012-02-01
š Original message:On 2012 February 01 Wednesday, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> > old clients won't they? They don't pass IsStandard().
>
> IsStandard() is for accepting transactions into the memory pool.
> Non-standard transactions are verified just fine when they are in the block
> chain.
Ah. My misunderstanding then.
> If we do a breaking change to the protocol - such as adding a new
> transaction type - ALL users must upgrade. Those who don't will see a fork
> of the chain from before the first new-style transaction. That is not the
> case now.
That makes a big difference. Thanks for the correction.
Andy
--
Dr Andy Parkins
andyparkins at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20120201/a82fe52c/attachment.sig>;
Andy Parkins [ARCHIVE] /
npub1nxā¦7wjrv
2023-06-07 03:02:44
in reply to nevent1qā¦v32a
Author Public Key
npub1nxlvf9mj3jzgue25n5d9y47s3h5hvg0ded9hwpejdxj9mtrs34vs97wjrvPublished at
2023-06-07 03:02:44Event JSON
{
"id": "55999b93579ee327db6c2f8cd3291cbbbdec2af2fc24c7561afbc6285f763fb1",
"pubkey": "99bec497728c848e65549d1a5257d08de97621edcb4b77073269a45dac708d59",
"created_at": 1686106964,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c92e2a87aa2d3c7365eadb419b42aac76742888a43a9dd185e4a98ca6fda909f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bb44e673ef50bfd9ba3c8654a77ad12e43ea7e1cdf41c7fe454641d2e264dd50",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2012-02-01\nš Original message:On 2012 February 01 Wednesday, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\n\u003e \u003e old clients won't they? They don't pass IsStandard().\n\u003e \n\u003e IsStandard() is for accepting transactions into the memory pool.\n\u003e Non-standard transactions are verified just fine when they are in the block\n\u003e chain.\n\nAh. My misunderstanding then.\n \n\u003e If we do a breaking change to the protocol - such as adding a new\n\u003e transaction type - ALL users must upgrade. Those who don't will see a fork\n\u003e of the chain from before the first new-style transaction. That is not the\n\u003e case now.\n\nThat makes a big difference. Thanks for the correction.\n\n\nAndy\n\n\n-- \nDr Andy Parkins\nandyparkins at gmail.com\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 198 bytes\nDesc: This is a digitally signed message part.\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20120201/a82fe52c/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "5c24137cc2de266448494cbc0cf1663f4299844e871f36bd2c72868c66c8f3f1918c3db1e2e51b4b09b2020bc7c510973c8b405f799d668a3d4664a69d353105"
}