đ
Original date posted:2014-04-29
đ Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We have BIP70 already in use (over a hundred paid requests).
Could you elaborate on why this needs changing?
On 28-04-14 14:39, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> There is a discussion about clarifying how BIP70 signs payment
> requests here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/41
>
> The issue is what to do with the signature field before signing.
> The code Mike and I initially wrote does this:
>
> request.set_signature(string(""));
>
> (sets signature to the empty string)
>
> I think that is a mistake; it should be:
>
> request.clear_signature();
>
> (clears signature field, so it is not serialized at all).
>
> So: if you are implementing, or have implemented, the payment
> protocol, please chime in. I'd like to change the spec and the
> reference implementation NOW, while BIP70 is still a 'Draft'.
>
> Because this type of "hey, I'm implementing your standard and it
> doesn't work the way I think it should" mistake is exactly why BIPs
> take a while before being declared 'Final.'
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing
> platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started
> now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development
> mailing list Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTX9bcAAoJELhWickZBkAlKqcH/RVFAr6vGgDjJvYah46StMHy
ZhKwpV1oqFCslOts6MyO+bZp9uDRlmYtnAy02CTPmlico3IyK85/+CGCGEdyiGo1
AEI2Ixr5FJs9t8uAVLyUKwOQddUFEJuZuiKXd1Wl9GqfG/z8gwdSxd08Wrq57lSH
JdwUnWOG1xBwyhgm7stqFoXgTrrnFNcE97vwsk6QMIzJG/v0suw7Lp42q7bKYaA/
J9xWSQ1cRKSPdsmu4K45oxXriqUmiqz3EouaTSQqC80OO7y8sfa96DqiHR83Vy3w
KUna5enjGqhhberWCokg3x5lCiH/IfLPrgK23iib4cg6Vm70jSQ2S2Xh/NuoDaM=
=JA5K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jouke Hofman [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zvâŚt9a4a
2023-06-07 15:20:30
in reply to nevent1qâŚ4ryw
Author Public Key
npub1zvde9x7jfl4rk5dpr8lywl5ylz7uy5uc67ugz7vtlqeemzljv44szt9a4aPublished at
2023-06-07 15:20:30Event JSON
{
"id": "55a714389439f40484e6f2d3fcc6e442069413d07ee329f8bbdbd2437939fd43",
"pubkey": "131b929bd24fea3b51a119fe477e84f8bdc25398d7b881798bf8339d8bf2656b",
"created_at": 1686151230,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cb6fed619ee0df5a1df25220a81984ff60046186bfb20d856258461f0aad2d8b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"dbd937c139bde5013433f11e9cd1b50d66f34aaaf79de4cb5cb5ded15214ce8b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"36f641db718ac5baddc8b8808f7efe494714fa47d2236a0ba0b7be947749ea67"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2014-04-29\nđ Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nWe have BIP70 already in use (over a hundred paid requests).\n\nCould you elaborate on why this needs changing?\n\n\n\nOn 28-04-14 14:39, Gavin Andresen wrote:\n\u003e There is a discussion about clarifying how BIP70 signs payment\n\u003e requests here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/41\n\u003e \n\u003e The issue is what to do with the signature field before signing.\n\u003e The code Mike and I initially wrote does this:\n\u003e \n\u003e request.set_signature(string(\"\"));\n\u003e \n\u003e (sets signature to the empty string)\n\u003e \n\u003e I think that is a mistake; it should be:\n\u003e \n\u003e request.clear_signature();\n\u003e \n\u003e (clears signature field, so it is not serialized at all).\n\u003e \n\u003e So: if you are implementing, or have implemented, the payment\n\u003e protocol, please chime in. I'd like to change the spec and the\n\u003e reference implementation NOW, while BIP70 is still a 'Draft'.\n\u003e \n\u003e Because this type of \"hey, I'm implementing your standard and it\n\u003e doesn't work the way I think it should\" mistake is exactly why BIPs\n\u003e take a while before being declared 'Final.'\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\n\u003e \n\"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE\n\u003e Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.\n\u003e Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing\n\u003e platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started\n\u003e now for free.\" http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development\n\u003e mailing list Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net \n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e \n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)\nComment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTX9bcAAoJELhWickZBkAlKqcH/RVFAr6vGgDjJvYah46StMHy\nZhKwpV1oqFCslOts6MyO+bZp9uDRlmYtnAy02CTPmlico3IyK85/+CGCGEdyiGo1\nAEI2Ixr5FJs9t8uAVLyUKwOQddUFEJuZuiKXd1Wl9GqfG/z8gwdSxd08Wrq57lSH\nJdwUnWOG1xBwyhgm7stqFoXgTrrnFNcE97vwsk6QMIzJG/v0suw7Lp42q7bKYaA/\nJ9xWSQ1cRKSPdsmu4K45oxXriqUmiqz3EouaTSQqC80OO7y8sfa96DqiHR83Vy3w\nKUna5enjGqhhberWCokg3x5lCiH/IfLPrgK23iib4cg6Vm70jSQ2S2Xh/NuoDaM=\n=JA5K\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "d1bdb895245671e7695f4b9356f0f83b5951f7f67b5b3c402cca211f1d2de1391d8b2bcf06e03e5892b71ab92a81c8958e78b4417703ce37953954b81232d9d2"
}