📅 Original date posted:2013-08-13
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/2013 03:01 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
> anyone tested the secure encrypted p2p email:
> http://bitmail.sf.net
Not lately. It's pretty CPU and network intensive, which may or may
not be detrimental to your use case.
I keep meaning to read through these security analyses of Bitmessage
but I'm a little short on compute cycles at the moment:
https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=1666.0
http://www.reddit.com/r/bitmessage/comments/1fwyx7/a_security_analysis_of_bitmessage/
- --
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/
PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/
If at first you don't succeed, call for an airstrike.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlIKk94ACgkQO9j/K4B7F8FMsgCgkuM56fI4hVT9H1ueZSFwl9Kk
qRoAoJkKZf4afKgVQKtDO6zRd/Auc/RV
=zwmX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
The Doctor [ARCHIVE] /
npub1uc…ngrm8
2023-06-07 15:05:52
in reply to nevent1q…4aly
Author Public Key
npub1uct3er4ytkdyvtnaqh2k7y6wjdlqkn672uly7ng4f4trl2cj93fq0ngrm8Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:05:52Event JSON
{
"id": "55d481c95746efe4d4dcef447557a2cfaea415eeebe95812ae47974603127d92",
"pubkey": "e6171c8ea45d9a462e7d05d56f134e937e0b4f5e573e4f4d154d563fab122c52",
"created_at": 1686150352,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5035351ef93bf6bf8adc4ecb46092edc0d751399d2d220415c2ef9bc9bcc7ff6",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3b768b97cd71362c33fdeb36d14b4c7171b33fa780669d5974bf769310ce586b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c534bb535ca1eba460ab96ad869cfa2160259b441c95515f281c187f0130f4f3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-08-13\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nOn 08/09/2013 03:01 PM, Randolph D. wrote:\n\u003e anyone tested the secure encrypted p2p email:\n\u003e http://bitmail.sf.net\n\nNot lately. It's pretty CPU and network intensive, which may or may\nnot be detrimental to your use case.\n\nI keep meaning to read through these security analyses of Bitmessage\nbut I'm a little short on compute cycles at the moment:\n\nhttps://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=1666.0\n\nhttp://www.reddit.com/r/bitmessage/comments/1fwyx7/a_security_analysis_of_bitmessage/\n\n- -- \nThe Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]\nDeveloper, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/\n\nPGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1\nWWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/\n\nIf at first you don't succeed, call for an airstrike.\n\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)\nComment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/\n\niEYEARECAAYFAlIKk94ACgkQO9j/K4B7F8FMsgCgkuM56fI4hVT9H1ueZSFwl9Kk\nqRoAoJkKZf4afKgVQKtDO6zRd/Auc/RV\n=zwmX\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "8ce48cd74aba5c56e1fc9cfbda36088790ddb722d3798e7ea872e4d79f19a50051e996a7e202c1c79c069c808de3c51cb18ebee101770bfd3b80af27b3b1d87e"
}