📅 Original date posted:2016-06-09
📝 Original message:Hi
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:24:09AM +0000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> Reduction to plaintext isn't an interesting attack vector for an active
>> attacker: they can simply impersonate the remote side.
>>
>> This is addressed via authentication, where available, which is done by a
>> separate specification that builds on this one.
>
> Are there any links to discussions on how authentication may be done?
I'm currently working on the Auth-BIP which is not worth reviewing it
right now (I will post it to the mailing list once it has been reached a
stable level where it can be discusses).
If you can't wait, here is the current work:
https://github.com/jonasschnelli/bips/blob/35d7e382cdd6955ff42726c3d06c44e33f61ae52/bip-undef-0.mediawiki
Most recent MITM/auth discussion (there where plenty of discussions on
IRC about this topic):
https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2016-04-04/?msg=63463826&page=3
</jonas>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160609/8f75bb8c/attachment.sig>;
Jonas Schnelli [ARCHIVE] /
npub1nf…3dtxs
2023-06-07 17:51:02
in reply to nevent1q…ugqz
Author Public Key
npub1nfrrurat393mqymf3s26pujyn5vujlem3pzcukr5p9d4qpklngxq43dtxsPublished at
2023-06-07 17:51:02Event JSON
{
"id": "58203c2e55452d2e1054c3fc99d786215c128e9d195e6aedc17c904cd75e1765",
"pubkey": "9a463e0fab8963b013698c15a0f2449d19c97f3b88458e5874095b5006df9a0c",
"created_at": 1686160262,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"aeda77d61b40be2458afb3260d199e3d7451dcb2584d3b995b1ad50b49ac1ad3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7751a6f439a10701aa7bcecf42bbfc4db2adb003ad50c38abf50abab642ab1e4",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"62dd2acf551a4b84c7633b4123d4143c9fa10f2f194ac4d1f7a942e5b49c6e4d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-06-09\n📝 Original message:Hi\n\n\u003e On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:24:09AM +0000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Reduction to plaintext isn't an interesting attack vector for an active\n\u003e\u003e attacker: they can simply impersonate the remote side.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e This is addressed via authentication, where available, which is done by a\n\u003e\u003e separate specification that builds on this one.\n\u003e \n\u003e Are there any links to discussions on how authentication may be done?\n\nI'm currently working on the Auth-BIP which is not worth reviewing it\nright now (I will post it to the mailing list once it has been reached a\nstable level where it can be discusses).\n\nIf you can't wait, here is the current work:\nhttps://github.com/jonasschnelli/bips/blob/35d7e382cdd6955ff42726c3d06c44e33f61ae52/bip-undef-0.mediawiki\n\n\nMost recent MITM/auth discussion (there where plenty of discussions on\nIRC about this topic):\nhttps://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2016-04-04/?msg=63463826\u0026page=3\n\n\n\u003c/jonas\u003e\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 819 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160609/8f75bb8c/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "6aec3992489882b25e6b4304eafc5b856be3a27449597f985ac723bf41a14b1c4fd7cef2d45dae8e6310e6b82a032cabd1c26b6754d25b59c2e6fed65a7fdfdf"
}