Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-24 📝 Original message:BIPs are accepted into BIP ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-24
📝 Original message:BIPs are accepted into BIP repo with a low "reasonable" threshold.
Code is accepted into the Bitcoin Core repo when it is likely that the
community will accept a change.
There is no voting in the way you think. Devs commit changes the users will
accept and use. Users "fire" developers by choosing different devs or
different software.
Standard open source method.
On Jun 24, 2015 4:41 PM, "Raystonn" <raystonn at hotmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to start a civil discussion on an undefined, or at least
> unwritten, portion of the BIP process. Who should get to vote on approval
> to commit a BIP implementation into Bitcoin Core? Is a simple majority of
> these voters sufficient for approval? If not, then what is?
>
> Raystonn
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150624/5eae6595/attachment-0001.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:40:03Event JSON
{
"id": "58287ffe1945cfc99cc08ad19aca6957c3f2f02df1a3caa47367361eab9c9883",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686152403,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3fe09b8bc3b13f27e42579b8ab63a325ab25d17e0571ce6b5f141d69b2abe4bf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-24\n📝 Original message:BIPs are accepted into BIP repo with a low \"reasonable\" threshold.\n\nCode is accepted into the Bitcoin Core repo when it is likely that the\ncommunity will accept a change.\n\nThere is no voting in the way you think. Devs commit changes the users will\naccept and use. Users \"fire\" developers by choosing different devs or\ndifferent software.\n\nStandard open source method.\n On Jun 24, 2015 4:41 PM, \"Raystonn\" \u003craystonn at hotmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I would like to start a civil discussion on an undefined, or at least\n\u003e unwritten, portion of the BIP process. Who should get to vote on approval\n\u003e to commit a BIP implementation into Bitcoin Core? Is a simple majority of\n\u003e these voters sufficient for approval? If not, then what is?\n\u003e\n\u003e Raystonn\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150624/5eae6595/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "01f87bb92eea7c622a2b25457974a063268ff0bb7717486f904e7d97b9e1574ad69749753559748be5c866215c2b2bcfdc39de0f521b67218bc23a664a2eab82"
}