📅 Original date posted:2014-01-01
📝 Original message:>
> Oh, it did? When was that? I must have missed this excitement :)
>>
>
I would be very interested to learn more about this. It seems the steady
state load on the site is not very high:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/287
(Saivann ran Google Analytics on the site for a little while to get traffic
figures). Peak of 10 visitors per second, assume a 10x blowup on resources,
that's only ~100 reqs/sec steady state, that shouldn't strain any kind of
reasonable server. So perhaps the specs of the dedicated server were not
what you might imagine.
Perhaps we should move the site over to Jeremy's hosting? It shouldn't be
very expensive to serve outside of major press cycles. Once that is done,
perhaps we can find/blag some SSL-protected file hosting.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140101/20754667/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:11:20
in reply to nevent1q…mru9
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:11:20Event JSON
{
"id": "51e7a0cc458bffd6fe1c88ce2265a3b017cee6e066e0313b1976029f52875fde",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686150680,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2011b767c16285ff848807a81713a335415663efaabe15ae3e3ea269f035984b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5d9276417e32bde1b6eafeb2137f0d5c9d6ad638ee99e457239e07e771a8c27c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-01\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e Oh, it did? When was that? I must have missed this excitement :)\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\nI would be very interested to learn more about this. It seems the steady\nstate load on the site is not very high:\n\nhttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/287\n\n(Saivann ran Google Analytics on the site for a little while to get traffic\nfigures). Peak of 10 visitors per second, assume a 10x blowup on resources,\nthat's only ~100 reqs/sec steady state, that shouldn't strain any kind of\nreasonable server. So perhaps the specs of the dedicated server were not\nwhat you might imagine.\n\nPerhaps we should move the site over to Jeremy's hosting? It shouldn't be\nvery expensive to serve outside of major press cycles. Once that is done,\nperhaps we can find/blag some SSL-protected file hosting.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140101/20754667/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "21c20b5d7a398814eac7d103fbfc0b8c092e078e601bcfdd61928fd731f2fdfd5760b394ce7b7f01fb87c060bf9039e5cbdf0bb2098342695fbca3a315c2db65"
}