Fe₂🦀₃⋅H₂🦀 (npub1y6t…9wl9) binkle (npub1kdy…2hnf) It's best if you encode lossy stuff yourself when testing so you know the audio isn't going through some filters that'd give false positives, but speaking on lossless, I can only tell the difference forensically; higher quality lossy codecs are indistinguishable to my ear (while also being a 10th the size).
A fun hands-on experiment is to take a known lossless recording, encode an MP3 of it (MP3 specifically because it tries to match the original waveform rather than being perceptually the same), flip the waveform, and listen to the interference. You won't hear anything during quiet parts and the loud parts will sound like your speakers blew out. Here's an example from the Spirited Away Suite, 8:28 to 8:39. The first file is the lossless interference with Audacity's "220-260 kbps (Best Quality)" variable bit rate MP3 and the second is the original lossless.
https://media.singing.dog/e5a6e32147301791961895910a753bd415969ed47bd7f44bf0f33b2e505f49b5.flac
https://media.singing.dog/86fc88d190d16ad642c58019e3558c85a6f59fd4bd6a0590204fdff1138ba28e.flac
Coyote /
npub1w7…rpc4w
2024-03-13 04:04:41
in reply to nevent1q…u262
Author Public Key
npub1w7x9m8xutlezyzmu7d78d8ygzk6sdpncfuuds8jsz2wnwk8f52dqkrpc4wPublished at
2024-03-13 04:04:41Event JSON
{
"id": "51aabe0527839a0375b62c48aa9c9434501b0cb999f1eabef5fbcf8fdfbe1a7d",
"pubkey": "778c5d9cdc5ff2220b7cf37c769c8815b50686784f38d81e50129d3758e9a29a",
"created_at": 1710302681,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"26976d1f3f3270311c86a59315751d66bd770aa35a929529271fca721afee1af",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b3482fd6b7d6ee4fd5b25a54f73d7eeb2047979b85c0ab2b029274a0c3dea86e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"543e109babb7eee7881301005963116acc136ad06afe04d086b5531216511a81",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.singing.dog/objects/276c5aa7-c45d-471f-8409-43c7ef0f64d7",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1y6tk68elxfcrz8yx5kf32agav67hwz4rt2ff22f8rl98yxh7uxhsx69wl9 nostr:npub1kdyzl44h6mhyl4djtf20w0t7avsy09umshq2k2czjf62ps774phqcd2hnf It's best if you encode lossy stuff yourself when testing so you know the audio isn't going through some filters that'd give false positives, but speaking on lossless, I can only tell the difference forensically; higher quality lossy codecs are indistinguishable to my ear (while also being a 10th the size).\n\nA fun hands-on experiment is to take a known lossless recording, encode an MP3 of it (MP3 specifically because it tries to match the original waveform rather than being perceptually the same), flip the waveform, and listen to the interference. You won't hear anything during quiet parts and the loud parts will sound like your speakers blew out. Here's an example from the Spirited Away Suite, 8:28 to 8:39. The first file is the lossless interference with Audacity's \"220-260 kbps (Best Quality)\" variable bit rate MP3 and the second is the original lossless.\n\nhttps://media.singing.dog/e5a6e32147301791961895910a753bd415969ed47bd7f44bf0f33b2e505f49b5.flac\n\nhttps://media.singing.dog/86fc88d190d16ad642c58019e3558c85a6f59fd4bd6a0590204fdff1138ba28e.flac",
"sig": "0cce93c554e4a176ba5f81cc7c0a6b0b4e41e62fecc7f9831d8feed5efe9f42ed61b7dc2fcec64263378ebdc7b96899834fae4f431118d4eec3414c18b931c1a"
}