Pro/Con of Nostr Clients
Iris.to
Pro: Everyone has a web browser, so it’s easy for beginners to on-board. Simple easy layout.
Con: They use CloudFlare, so do NOT let the website see your private key. You need to use the Flamingo browser extension to sign events because CloudFlare strips away httpS encryption. Without a browser extension, it should be treated like you’re handing your private key to the US government. You can’t view DMs using a browser extension only. Also CloudFlare will browser fingerprint you and block Tor.
Primal.net
Pro: Fast for Tor. I recommend this only for Tor browser. The reason it’s fast is because you’re not getting the content from each individual relay, but it’s aggregated to their database.
Con: Primal’s model is closer to traditional social media, where they can censor content. Beyond using this for speed on Tor, it’s dangerous centralization.
Amethyst
Pro: FOSS Android client in the F-Droid store that works on degoogled phones. Not only is the interface just like Twitter, but they added in “sealed sender” style DMs, similar to Signal to hide metadata.
Con: Be aware that if you’re not using a degoogled phone, then the government and Google can probably get your private key. And for the high risk “tinfoil hat” paranoid, you can’t control the Baseband modem of ANY mobile device which hackers can remotely compromise. But for the average memer, private keys on mobile is fine.
Gossip
Pro: This is what I’d use for famous or controversial influences with a high threat model. Desktop Linux is supported, and it’s programmed in Rust which could potentially add security against memory corruption for poorly vetted third party images downloaded off relays. Password lock on posting is good.
Con: No sealed sender DMs yet. Hard to use.
Tip: You want to first try Amethyst, then graduate to Gossip when you understand that you have to enter a relay where someone posts to find them. (hint: lookup their relays quickly on Tor via primal.net.)
Lume
Pro: Lots of features such as mapping relationships, good widgets for hashtags and topics. Password lock is good.
Con: There’s still Linux bugs. I can’t recommend it for Linux, as I had issues. However, the developer has significantly improved Linux builds from just a few months ago, but it’s not there yet.
Damus
Pro: iPhone Client for less tech-savvy users
Con: Apple (and therefore the government) can probably get that private key, but again for the average person it’s ok.
</end>
Please consider reposting this to spread adoption. I might make video tutorials for gossip
SimplifiedPrivacy.com Podcast / SimplifiedPrivacy.com
npub14s…jt5d6
2023-11-17 22:25:13
Author Public Key
npub14slk4lshtylkrqg9z0dvng09gn58h88frvnax7uga3v0h25szj4qzjt5d6Published at
2023-11-17 22:25:13Event JSON
{
"id": "59b1fd6010c07505d8c55e50f41a6347ad451dd391403aa22253150c135e1828",
"pubkey": "ac3f6afe17593f61810513dac9a1e544e87b9ce91b27d37b88ec58fbaa9014aa",
"created_at": 1700259913,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"r",
"Iris.to"
],
[
"r",
"Primal.net"
],
[
"r",
"primal.net."
]
],
"content": "Pro/Con of Nostr Clients\n\nIris.to\nPro: Everyone has a web browser, so it’s easy for beginners to on-board. Simple easy layout.\nCon: They use CloudFlare, so do NOT let the website see your private key. You need to use the Flamingo browser extension to sign events because CloudFlare strips away httpS encryption. Without a browser extension, it should be treated like you’re handing your private key to the US government. You can’t view DMs using a browser extension only. Also CloudFlare will browser fingerprint you and block Tor. \n\nPrimal.net\nPro: Fast for Tor. I recommend this only for Tor browser. The reason it’s fast is because you’re not getting the content from each individual relay, but it’s aggregated to their database.\nCon: Primal’s model is closer to traditional social media, where they can censor content. Beyond using this for speed on Tor, it’s dangerous centralization.\n\nAmethyst\nPro: FOSS Android client in the F-Droid store that works on degoogled phones. Not only is the interface just like Twitter, but they added in “sealed sender” style DMs, similar to Signal to hide metadata.\nCon: Be aware that if you’re not using a degoogled phone, then the government and Google can probably get your private key. And for the high risk “tinfoil hat” paranoid, you can’t control the Baseband modem of ANY mobile device which hackers can remotely compromise. But for the average memer, private keys on mobile is fine.\n\nGossip\nPro: This is what I’d use for famous or controversial influences with a high threat model. Desktop Linux is supported, and it’s programmed in Rust which could potentially add security against memory corruption for poorly vetted third party images downloaded off relays. Password lock on posting is good.\nCon: No sealed sender DMs yet. Hard to use.\nTip: You want to first try Amethyst, then graduate to Gossip when you understand that you have to enter a relay where someone posts to find them. (hint: lookup their relays quickly on Tor via primal.net.)\n\nLume\nPro: Lots of features such as mapping relationships, good widgets for hashtags and topics. Password lock is good.\nCon: There’s still Linux bugs. I can’t recommend it for Linux, as I had issues. However, the developer has significantly improved Linux builds from just a few months ago, but it’s not there yet.\n\nDamus\nPro: iPhone Client for less tech-savvy users\nCon: Apple (and therefore the government) can probably get that private key, but again for the average person it’s ok.\n\n\u003c/end\u003e\nPlease consider reposting this to spread adoption. I might make video tutorials for gossip",
"sig": "97342f467cb666524f8b1ad92fb1e718a98e4a5fdecb720d2bb884d7be7ad75f64c8de814a7b890370b4c09a4833008ccb2684c00fc30ef0796dfbf0cf2c4dc3"
}