📅 Original date posted:2017-06-01
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Chris via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 06/01/2017 06:10 PM, Olaoluwa Osuntokun via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
>> One aspect which isn't in this BIP draft is direct support for unconfirmed
>> transactions. I consider such a feature an important UX feature for mobile
>> phones, and something which I've personally seen as an important
>> UX-experience when on-boarding new users to Bitcoin.
>
> Totally agree. My first thought is maybe you could keep bip37 filtering
> as optional for unconfirmed transactions. Since you're only interested
Really bad for privacy. Data for transactions at the tip is only
14kb/s-- potentially less if segwit is in use and you're not getting
witnesses. Is that really that burdensome?
FWIW, leaving a mobile browser just running while pointed at some
websites seems to use more traffic than that just loading advertising.
:)
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 18:02:06
in reply to nevent1q…gte7
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetPublished at
2023-06-07 18:02:06Event JSON
{
"id": "59a6666e794bab3cd8bfc92297840ac55745c373f7d773bd6a1d06659608d50b",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686160926,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"55a56c7ebba05dd9613a9ae00ae6d5bbfa4f7fd0155fa447a7d09d61ff658a4b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"be82db6ddae1af9f7b25016ffb9d1d76c3907511f77fae9e7f50f09fb85e6d92",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"94ba46cdbb14c3443fcc2e1278b41ad6bc36a2d595149d6940652dab7e162523"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-06-01\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Chris via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On 06/01/2017 06:10 PM, Olaoluwa Osuntokun via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e One aspect which isn't in this BIP draft is direct support for unconfirmed\n\u003e\u003e transactions. I consider such a feature an important UX feature for mobile\n\u003e\u003e phones, and something which I've personally seen as an important\n\u003e\u003e UX-experience when on-boarding new users to Bitcoin.\n\u003e\n\u003e Totally agree. My first thought is maybe you could keep bip37 filtering\n\u003e as optional for unconfirmed transactions. Since you're only interested\n\nReally bad for privacy. Data for transactions at the tip is only\n14kb/s-- potentially less if segwit is in use and you're not getting\nwitnesses. Is that really that burdensome?\n\nFWIW, leaving a mobile browser just running while pointed at some\nwebsites seems to use more traffic than that just loading advertising.\n:)",
"sig": "3a7ffd1d5923055afdd699b5e621c33df76297bb0b0ce403d3a6b537a31a342e0905f77e38226415f78b15caf7e5ac383dd38422d3945ba482d3a2fbc708592a"
}