Tom Zander [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-05-04 📝 Original message:I agree with you here, ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-05-04
📝 Original message:I agree with you here, Erik. Greg's standard answer doesn’t apply to your
suggestion.
I think he was a bit too trigger happy because we have seen a lot of similar
suggestions that have the Sybill issue he mentioned.
On Thursday, 4 May 2017 15:15:02 CEST Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Greg
> > The primary result would be paying people to sybil attack the network.
>
> I cannot imagine the benefit to replicating an ip address in this case,
> except maybe you think that you would be more likely to be selected as a
> peer? But there would be no actual advantage since download peers are
> selected based on throughput and actual blocks served.
--
Tom Zander
Blog:
https://zander.github.ioVlog:
https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannelPublished at
2023-06-07 18:00:46Event JSON
{
"id": "59968980864a065fb61929c224c37fc2240e253ff3aa2c445bbd500e32637e26",
"pubkey": "dcb947d818dbfd7cf0baf26c0d5eb606b5a32336c5483fb53e05146315833ca7",
"created_at": 1686160846,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f1a95efbdac6335d0cd6694de02881d5a2d41c381de623952606610046b1a5ed",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8fee0a9764a55549b6b7e1ba3387dbb3d0e7d7f78f55f4e91d30289c2f33039e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-05-04\n📝 Original message:I agree with you here, Erik. Greg's standard answer doesn’t apply to your \nsuggestion.\nI think he was a bit too trigger happy because we have seen a lot of similar \nsuggestions that have the Sybill issue he mentioned.\n\n\nOn Thursday, 4 May 2017 15:15:02 CEST Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Greg\n\u003e \u003e The primary result would be paying people to sybil attack the network.\n\u003e \n\u003e I cannot imagine the benefit to replicating an ip address in this case,\n\u003e except maybe you think that you would be more likely to be selected as a\n\u003e peer? But there would be no actual advantage since download peers are\n\u003e selected based on throughput and actual blocks served.\n\n-- \nTom Zander\nBlog: https://zander.github.io\nVlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel",
"sig": "cc3a3e385b4dcf6b66cafe97bdf4ed6448bb0b41cd6114f861b5d1b6e6110d38a1bdd03b9be6f759e33f87c28917310451c877601dd0052a30f4661ddb193b93"
}