Event JSON
{
"id": "5913eb46a934615edef6d9a2ba3c6ed5bccd9dd138d28ad8f82154192da98572",
"pubkey": "1f7a865063323ca9dd2865f518ebbf50c74951a1a29699c7e1c607c56beb4908",
"created_at": 1701854513,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"ad951bfdf8f75f9c42aa74da8322bff38accbe325b7e8a9eec916226ac0ac24a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"dfd7b128bbb1222873eca016c1411fa7037a2d3b71dc0bf736480db54d3a61c3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"ab95a0368e0f808fe8f02badd33457f53d251ce9d6e5ac7e90f3598f11379054",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"meta"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://datasci.social/users/mszll/statuses/111532737412881929",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub14k23hl0c7a0ecs42wndgxg4l7w9ve03jtdlg48hvj93zdtq2cf9q3ted68 My mostly uninformed guess is that the concrete numbers might be quite meaningless (or test something not so relevant), or show large variations, and the real test is how seriously countries are taking the PISA test - maybe the more serious the more of a sign for metric chasing which probably comes with statistical illiteracy and issues like the mcnamara fallacy or Goodhart's law. #meta \n\nBut maybe I am wrong and the PISA test numbers are indeed useful themselves.",
"sig": "2ede64c89c63f997065ffade8da33886c2ca066aa876b6cd7e046d9cfd08b9d0527bd2b2768fa81da2bf231302831434b694d3b13e84b1f1e1d4ef6b9b18282a"
}