I missed the last part, thanks!
I’d still suggest the pool is not at all “non-custodial” - they both mention needing to be a custodian for small miners, but also, from a miner’s perspective, there’s just as much trust in them as any other pool. The pool can always decline to pay out and there’s no recourse available in-protocol.
matt / Matt Corallo
npub185…swrdp
2023-11-29 17:35:36
in reply to nevent1q…acd3
Author Public Key
npub185h9z5yxn8uc7retm0n6gkm88358lejzparxms5kmy9epr236k2qcswrdpPublished at
2023-11-29 17:35:36Event JSON
{
"id": "5bd71179d93df69bce10464a6327e328bdaeee8d349c7c6cc8865dbc15de021a",
"pubkey": "3d2e51508699f98f0f2bdbe7a45b673c687fe6420f466dc296d90b908d51d594",
"created_at": 1701279336,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cb752c76c00e2ad948623bf404d104b9d107da4909b0fab511fee9da0bf9c9d5"
],
[
"e",
"79ffa5e768f59bef0d9e3ebde4c18fa37cdbed6544b6378d4be79fb7fd7b3e54"
],
[
"p",
"9267545d2917b80f707ffdb44a8ff979182568ef7baa04ee756b1f01d4e3688a"
],
[
"p",
"eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f"
]
],
"content": "I missed the last part, thanks!\n\nI’d still suggest the pool is not at all “non-custodial” - they both mention needing to be a custodian for small miners, but also, from a miner’s perspective, there’s just as much trust in them as any other pool. The pool can always decline to pay out and there’s no recourse available in-protocol.",
"sig": "252e48eaaaf04aa51949833186792a04dbc82feccc1fb19f9fa187a182e79607539327b3f3fc8fa24d406c3f9be53de61aa7b46a291bbd2e48107d858c6597fc"
}