Nicolas Dorier [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-03-08 📝 Original message: Great, indeed we had same ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-03-08
📝 Original message:
Great, indeed we had same idea, I don't see how it solve the hashes in
advance.
As Alice knows
H(1000000) = <random secret seed>).
If she need the hash to the first commitment she need to hash the random secret
seed 1000000 times. I think it is exactly the same problem as it is the exact
same idea said differently.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier at gmail.com> writes:
> > One way deterministic RValue Generation
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Yes, in fact shachain is a variant of this which avoids
> generating several million hashes in advance. Interesting, I suggested
> using hashing in the Deployable Lightning paper but didn't actually
> spell out the idea. Hmm....
>
> Seems like it orignated from Adam Back:
>
>
https://lists.blockstream.io/pipermail/lightning-dev/2015-May/000000.html>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20160308/a4994ce6/attachment-0001.html>
Published at
2023-06-09 12:45:55Event JSON
{
"id": "54312b8d9f4a120557a7c5ffe4d4390470522274d0351406f139b912f7a5086c",
"pubkey": "bf0548dc0ad239e9e1e0bba3c969632ded402a68091cde1b21a0895e90bc9a57",
"created_at": 1686314755,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"55548f25f3655672eaf8683c73cc07ea4cd473c9f5d4c202e312a7b35566c018",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7383e298e7b78ac51bef0b96a861456e4fbb415604318eacfd4f228fa0e2b811",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-03-08\n📝 Original message:\nGreat, indeed we had same idea, I don't see how it solve the hashes in\nadvance.\nAs Alice knows\n\nH(1000000) = \u003crandom secret seed\u003e).\n\nIf she need the hash to the first commitment she need to hash the random secret\nseed 1000000 times. I think it is exactly the same problem as it is the exact\nsame idea said differently.\n\n\nOn Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Nicolas Dorier \u003cnicolas.dorier at gmail.com\u003e writes:\n\u003e \u003e One way deterministic RValue Generation\n\u003e\n\u003e Hi Nicolas,\n\u003e\n\u003e Yes, in fact shachain is a variant of this which avoids\n\u003e generating several million hashes in advance. Interesting, I suggested\n\u003e using hashing in the Deployable Lightning paper but didn't actually\n\u003e spell out the idea. Hmm....\n\u003e\n\u003e Seems like it orignated from Adam Back:\n\u003e\n\u003e https://lists.blockstream.io/pipermail/lightning-dev/2015-May/000000.html\n\u003e\n\u003e Cheers,\n\u003e Rusty.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20160308/a4994ce6/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "4ad7dc53d9dca282a64efde821566f6b90826c0eb771c65ffc6511d01bcda29489623900c8c3ce6d35efaa6d90523d3c1fbda9b185845ab04e6ac85717abfbbe"
}