Eric Voskuil [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-02-23 📝 Original message:On 02/23/2015 03:11 PM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-02-23
📝 Original message:On 02/23/2015 03:11 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>> I don't see how you propose to treat the bitcoin address as a
>> secp256k1 public key, or do you mean something else?
>
> Sorry, I skipped a step. I shouldn't make assumptions about what's
> obvious.
No problem, we don't all have the same context. I may have missed prior
discussion.
> The server would provide the public key and the client would
> convert it to address form then match against the URI it has scanned.
> If it didn't match, stop at that point.
Does this not also require the BT publication of the script for a P2SH
address?
e
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150223/d33deef7/attachment.sig>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:31:07Event JSON
{
"id": "540f043e877e793e68d04d80703cb39c262b6d88db3e64041dcc4b2192647019",
"pubkey": "82205f272f995d9be742779a3c19a2ae08522ca14824c3a3b01525fb5459161e",
"created_at": 1686151867,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dfefe04b212481eb3fe073238ab7d32774988526d8b8bf7f8fff0d7249ebe09f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b53ca472555b0d2254e46bd093e3da6cc5dc04e6788893c16ed4258efa46dacc",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-23\n📝 Original message:On 02/23/2015 03:11 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e\u003e I don't see how you propose to treat the bitcoin address as a\n\u003e\u003e secp256k1 public key, or do you mean something else?\n\u003e\n\u003e Sorry, I skipped a step. I shouldn't make assumptions about what's\n\u003e obvious.\n\nNo problem, we don't all have the same context. I may have missed prior\ndiscussion.\n\n\u003e The server would provide the public key and the client would\n\u003e convert it to address form then match against the URI it has scanned.\n\u003e If it didn't match, stop at that point.\n\nDoes this not also require the BT publication of the script for a P2SH\naddress?\n\ne\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 473 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150223/d33deef7/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "344191e2f063f616d1414f029314d38c62e44f527a6f0ee6259a98c45fdc904ffa86edc37b185492e3c4bee170da531b4386cd25fd15be6e490153f139ab1995"
}