Event JSON
{
"id": "542320be08dad7688dd24f125287f61b65afe1bf73dac52f20f2f71b1542473a",
"pubkey": "d51b095fb442b29d4c492c70340adca8731b6a1807b9b3b47746284457431a64",
"created_at": 1715268884,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"colorado"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/@colo_lee/112411861599193405",
"web"
],
[
"t",
"wetlands"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/users/colo_lee/statuses/112411861599193405",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://zirk.us/users/colo_lee/statuses/112411861599193405",
"pink.momostr"
]
],
"content": "In CO, vast numbers of streams are temporary or ephemeral, flowing only after major rainstorms \u0026 during spring runoff season. The Sackett decision said only wetlands that had a surface connection to continually flowing water qualified for protection. Many wetlands in CO have a sub-surface connection to streams, rather than one that can be observed above ground.\n\nWith the passage of this bill, CO wetland \u0026 ephemeral streams are once again protected.\n\nhttps://coloradosun.com/2024/05/09/colorado-law-protecting-wetlands-supreme-court/\n\n#Colorado #wetlands",
"sig": "31052bb67cf2142846e06a9b10ea7df773540bbd854f5ad307652ed14b812a08d5dc5c7fe6344b7661bbc48acba12403cdcaab4c9abb09cf169ee9f1d93374f0"
}