Whatever the content and regardless the frequency of contact, I'd still call it censorship. It doesn't matter if someone has naught but ill-intent, the message they are attempting to share is being reduced and, thus, censored.
That doesn't mean censorship is a bad thing, so long as you have control over/are in general agreement with what's censored for your personal self, and that's where the reach ends.
We have the choice and the right to block out any content we don't wish to interact with, to our benefit or our detriment. The issue comes in when someone else blocks you from receiving content without your knowledge/consent
Enlil / Enlil 🟠⚡🌿
npub1ap…kxnx6
2023-03-07 04:23:15
in reply to nevent1q…jf2a
Author Public Key
npub1ap0n26h0sdkvy6l53w3u4lwds3dumpkyykly2seq2na0ahdnneys5kxnx6Published at
2023-03-07 04:23:15Event JSON
{
"id": "54e5f3d21aca9f4fda77ce84b42a6144320cf47665970c2811c82547f23f2ea0",
"pubkey": "e85f356aef836cc26bf48ba3cafdcd845bcd86c425be45432054fafeddb39e49",
"created_at": 1678162995,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7e6ca626639a9eff671f3ddd894a8975a883e015cd99a6593eb1a9ba93cca002"
],
[
"p",
"e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb"
]
],
"content": "Whatever the content and regardless the frequency of contact, I'd still call it censorship. It doesn't matter if someone has naught but ill-intent, the message they are attempting to share is being reduced and, thus, censored. \n\nThat doesn't mean censorship is a bad thing, so long as you have control over/are in general agreement with what's censored for your personal self, and that's where the reach ends. \n\nWe have the choice and the right to block out any content we don't wish to interact with, to our benefit or our detriment. The issue comes in when someone else blocks you from receiving content without your knowledge/consent",
"sig": "d5bd93db56d6b27cbe47eaa3152642a8ccfa8067cb5031b69dce3b2f0de973dd959d83129e7bbb2593defbdc0c5aa19743a2392e6fbe8401a036ba46927ab886"
}