Event JSON
{
"id": "54bf7c3470337c951e381efd36125a4d52cdc760bfe31d6698322d6422ed3a62",
"pubkey": "be69dd448d8656ca9f947b861910a1dac6ad1e5bee9339bdb1dc8b1b46d71f6c",
"created_at": 1746465622,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dbd9557cb8e8d41e287ce311dc7cfcf79d07da59fdb027195659827f13cd31f9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"55e343e6589073d312fcab30075e4b4681369b65459eff36a7e2fe4f880acd1b"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.nostrplebs.com/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://purplepag.es/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.cercatrova.me/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.nostpy.lol/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.semisol.dev/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.primal.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.nostr.com.au/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.noswhere.com/"
]
],
"content": "Agree. Getting people comfortable with self custody, and the tools used to manage that effectively, is paramount.\n\nIn a world where any particular version of code becomes problematic, it can be addressed at that point. It may be harder to get more people to switch, but conversely ten users who are 100% of the footprint is worse.\n\nOn the fragility point, oddly, ETH had issues where two versions of the code became incompatible ( if I recall correctly ) and the chain split.\n\nThere is nuance in fragility, I think. ",
"sig": "3947bbe72d187c35b434e71f5a5f582a8bae2afc7f403ee83db418b0a4b1612aa1c0bbbc430a3d9900512cdb69051c2e4d18c659f734d1ffb6b1b8b43930d888"
}