How can a federal judge oversee a case where she has already pre-determined a crime based on political narratives?
Chutkan stated that J6 protesters were at the Capitol to "overthrow the government."
Let's objectively evaluate this claim. J6 protesters did not bring guns into the Capitol building. They provably killed no one. They had no means to "overthrow the government."
Indeed, the "insurrection" narrative is a delusional fantasy. The Trump supporters that showed up at the Capitol building after the president's speech were there to pressure Congress members to challenge the state elections.
These Trump supporters were not there to stop the election certification. This argument is ludicrous on its face; Trump's supporters backed the only plausible and constitutional effort to keep the president in office.
Among these Trump supporters were far-right and anarchist extremists who were seeking to create havoc. The FBI had known about their plans for months; in fact, they used unconstitutional surveillance means to gather this information. The FBI and Capitol Police nonetheless allowed the J6 rioters to descend on the capitol without National Guard troops guarding the Congress.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser had indeed stopped the National Guard from protecting the Congress during the expected election challenges. Multiple calls by Capitol Police Chief Sund to Pelosi through her HSA were made without the Speaker authorizing the National Guard. The partisan J6 committee suppressed documented evidence that Donald Trump wanted a minimum of 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the election challenges.
This is enough to leave the January 6 case against Donald Trump in shambles. That is in addition to the Congress having already declined to convict Donald Trump through the constitutional means of presidential impeachment.
Talk about double jeopardy.
Meanwhile, Chutkan exonerates all BLM rioters, despite the deaths of over 20 people during the conflagrations and the billions of dollars in damage — real, documented, objective criminal behavior.
As the AP reported: "U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan called it a false equivalence 'to compare the actions of people protesting, mostly peacefully, for civil rights' to the mob that 'was trying to overthrow the government.' She said doing so 'ignores the very real danger that the Jan. 6 riots pose to the foundation of our democracy.'"
The BLM riots were fueled by lies. George Floyd, for example, was shown by a coroner's report to have died with a fatal dosage of fentanyl in his system. There was never any racial animus on the part of Derek Chauvin proven by the court. Furthermore, there is scant data showing police officers target young black males with deadly force, once you correct for incidents.
The BLM rioters even gathered outside the White House in May 2020 and assaulted scores of Secret Service officers. Objectively, there were more cases of violence against law enforcement during the Floyd rioting than during the January 6 so-called "insurrection."
But since the racial justice narrative fits Judge Chutkan's political proclivities, she dismissed complaints about the rioters' criminal behavior and broad-brush painted even peaceful protesters at the Congress exercising their First Amendment rights as "insurrectionists."
If there is anyone seeking to overthrow an institution, it is Judge Chutkan desiring to replace our rule of law with the rule of biased political narratives.
The January 6 case should be dismissed. Judge Chutkan should be expelled from the bench.
Alas, we live in Biden's America. This means the rule of law is jettisoned in the interest of the regime selectively prosecuting a political enemy.
Judge Tanka Chutkan is not a servant of the law. She is a political hatchet-woman who has brazenly hijacked the court to commit election interference.
