This means we can spend less on base fees (and pass that onto you!), and also possibly reduce payment failure rates.
This is strictly an artificial problem. Why does a 100 individual transactions cost less than a batch of 100 transactions? What is being optimized for? Not the database size. Batching would lose instantaenous transfers and introduce an additional layer of complexity of keeping track of transactions for the end user for no real benefit. All node operators need to do is to set a fee algorithm that treats transactions regardless of their size.
What am I missing?
BitcoinLuffy / Bitcoin Luffy
npub1eq…033gt
2023-04-14 00:06:52
in reply to nevent1q…ql2j
Author Public Key
npub1eq063z9pcyh6xa22ukh9rwqf95shaje64zszvglhavdflp7q7wysl033gtPublished at
2023-04-14 00:06:52Event JSON
{
"id": "5cda7ff56051628839d6c6205997cf22d968a116e8644cb3286f1e933ffd0925",
"pubkey": "c81fa888a1c12fa3754ae5ae51b8092d217ecb3aa8a02623f7eb1a9f87c0f389",
"created_at": 1681430812,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"48a7adb2f7e49e8d8586b599e27fe0f5851b68179794fbe3dac85801e4683a53",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"52b4a076bcbbbdc3a1aefa3735816cf74993b1b8db202b01c883c58be7fad8bd"
]
],
"content": "This means we can spend less on base fees (and pass that onto you!), and also possibly reduce payment failure rates.\n\n\nThis is strictly an artificial problem. Why does a 100 individual transactions cost less than a batch of 100 transactions? What is being optimized for? Not the database size. Batching would lose instantaenous transfers and introduce an additional layer of complexity of keeping track of transactions for the end user for no real benefit. All node operators need to do is to set a fee algorithm that treats transactions regardless of their size. \n\nWhat am I missing?\n",
"sig": "8d65bdefe02eb70c7c2ffee6db651458d4d2e5df7161799cd91fbbf853ae6e3acb189793b5ef3e810b7967cb65aaf5d7323f883cc4780874ecd02e26ebf64b98"
}