📅 Original date posted:2015-05-13
📝 Original message:On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine at gmail.com> wrote:
> We have $3billion plus of value in this system to defend. The safe,
> conservative course is to increase the block size. Miners already have an
> incentive to find ways to encourage higher fees and we can help them with
> standard recommended propagation rules and hybrid priority/fee transaction
> selection for blocks that increases confirmation delays for low fee
> transactions.
>
You may find that the most economical solution, but I can't understand how
you can call it conservative.
Suggesting a hard fork is betting the survival of the entire ecosystem on
the bet that everyone will agree with and upgrade to new suggested software
before a flag date.
--
Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150513/deca7b80/attachment.html>;
Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tj…jtl6r
2023-06-07 15:34:46
in reply to nevent1q…mtys
Author Public Key
npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6rSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 15:34:46Event JSON
{
"id": "56d25de5f2a00506eb88d220e6f29a6ddbc622f7106340d8e077b170334eca35",
"pubkey": "5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6",
"created_at": 1686152086,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4fca8766cb3622944ad3338913b2eaab58533c317983b04a538d878303c3c989",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e384d06001d5a674d1fd9e7929862b3c079d8d64daf75ff19d8cc3a7a600ad3f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-05-13\n📝 Original message:On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Aaron Voisine \u003cvoisine at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e We have $3billion plus of value in this system to defend. The safe,\n\u003e conservative course is to increase the block size. Miners already have an\n\u003e incentive to find ways to encourage higher fees and we can help them with\n\u003e standard recommended propagation rules and hybrid priority/fee transaction\n\u003e selection for blocks that increases confirmation delays for low fee\n\u003e transactions.\n\u003e\n\nYou may find that the most economical solution, but I can't understand how\nyou can call it conservative.\n\nSuggesting a hard fork is betting the survival of the entire ecosystem on\nthe bet that everyone will agree with and upgrade to new suggested software\nbefore a flag date.\n\n-- \nPieter\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150513/deca7b80/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "cf87c3c0bb18bb90b5a77b133a342ead15c98f7ba44b19ca4f1badd57837fd7054a02979d5ff577fee01afb062734960354211718ef1d31bd6a6cecc461ea249"
}