📅 Original date posted:2016-06-23
📝 Original message:On Jun 23, 2016 14:10, "Peter Todd" <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Right, so you accept that we'll exert some degree of editorial control;
the
> question now is what editorial policies should we exert?
No, I do not. I am saying that some degree of editorial control will
inevitably exist, simply because there is some human making the choice of
assigning a BIP number and merging. My opinion is that we should try to
restrict that editorial control to only be subject to objective process,
and not be dependent on personal opinions.
> My argument is that rejecting BIP75 is something we should do on
> ethical/strategic grounds. You may disagree with that, but please don't
troll
> and call that "advocating censorship"
I think that you are free to express dislike of BIP75. Suggesting to remove
it for that reason is utterly ridiculous to me, whatever you want to call
it.
--
Pieter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160623/ba7a229f/attachment.html>;
Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tj…jtl6r
2023-06-07 17:51:23
in reply to nevent1q…8h6g
Author Public Key
npub1tjephawh7fdf6358jufuh5eyxwauzrjqa7qn50pglee4tayc2ntqcjtl6rPublished at
2023-06-07 17:51:23Event JSON
{
"id": "5c2854e96c6dc4766fa10da8fe11d2d80f26b213a2d2c8b53912acf25dbb1132",
"pubkey": "5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6",
"created_at": 1686160283,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a5039b46ff53fe0ad45fb1e565b7c7f05169b35d2126c2ee18198a6f3405f573",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d14af14ab7e76318fced9507d85960562f4bf0848e812eb51ff7cc5588bad47b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-06-23\n📝 Original message:On Jun 23, 2016 14:10, \"Peter Todd\" \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Right, so you accept that we'll exert some degree of editorial control;\nthe\n\u003e question now is what editorial policies should we exert?\n\nNo, I do not. I am saying that some degree of editorial control will\ninevitably exist, simply because there is some human making the choice of\nassigning a BIP number and merging. My opinion is that we should try to\nrestrict that editorial control to only be subject to objective process,\nand not be dependent on personal opinions.\n\n\u003e My argument is that rejecting BIP75 is something we should do on\n\u003e ethical/strategic grounds. You may disagree with that, but please don't\ntroll\n\u003e and call that \"advocating censorship\"\n\nI think that you are free to express dislike of BIP75. Suggesting to remove\nit for that reason is utterly ridiculous to me, whatever you want to call\nit.\n\n-- \nPieter\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160623/ba7a229f/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "71561f8ca67bc0ca008ed2e001e4f81b67ac705435c7b0c59ef7ecb674ec107ef10f3ac05c7001af93a789832eca8f16ed2873b5bb08ddeb24d49ed90213f4bb"
}