📅 Original date posted:2017-12-01
📝 Original message:On 2017/11/30 14:20, mandar mulherkar via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I was wondering in terms of mass adoption, instead of long wallet
> addresses, maybe there should be a DNS-like decentralized mapping
> service to provide a user at crypto address?
A few years ago, I was part of an effort with Armory and Verisign to
make something similar to what you're describing.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wiley-paymentassoc-00 is where you can
find the one and only official draft. I worked on a follow-up with some
changes and some nice appendices, explaining some nice tricks one could
use to make payment management flexible. For various reasons, it never
got published. I think it's an interesting draft that could be turned
into something useful. Among other things, it was able to leverage BIP32
and allow payment requests to be generated that automatically pointed
payees to the correct branch. DNSSEC may have some issues but, AFAIK,
it's as the easiest way to bootstrap identity to a common, reasonably
secure standard.
--
---
Douglas Roark
Cryptocurrency, network security, travel, and art.
https://onename.com/droark
joroark at vt.edu
PGP key ID: 26623924
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 895 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20171130/ee8ac2e0/attachment-0001.sig>;
Douglas Roark [ARCHIVE] /
npub12v…dqa4q
2023-06-07 18:08:01
in reply to nevent1q…e45l
Author Public Key
npub12vlytlltjj7g3s227u9jtx2g8qtsu7gscynnn99k808ydr4vygcqvdqa4qPublished at
2023-06-07 18:08:01Event JSON
{
"id": "52c0cbefcd57b7155dd3a3187b880096b222f29bcda9221d7f927a8a4bace4f6",
"pubkey": "533e45ffeb94bc88c14af70b25994838170e7910c1273994b63bce468eac2230",
"created_at": 1686161281,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"aa26ac7d2c56b5e93f58d0a4616f8108b14cd88c555a82aa7113c62ff7cbed00",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8f0b4e0ef88067b7257b7b80305b204a6e1705d64194e1b498e5e96392931dbb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"2a007275f8708d857e3fc6523dad0fcbe5c6a5a1f53043352053a1048838b0d7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-12-01\n📝 Original message:On 2017/11/30 14:20, mandar mulherkar via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e I was wondering in terms of mass adoption, instead of long wallet\n\u003e addresses, maybe there should be a DNS-like decentralized mapping\n\u003e service to provide a user at crypto address?\n\nA few years ago, I was part of an effort with Armory and Verisign to\nmake something similar to what you're describing.\nhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wiley-paymentassoc-00 is where you can\nfind the one and only official draft. I worked on a follow-up with some\nchanges and some nice appendices, explaining some nice tricks one could\nuse to make payment management flexible. For various reasons, it never\ngot published. I think it's an interesting draft that could be turned\ninto something useful. Among other things, it was able to leverage BIP32\nand allow payment requests to be generated that automatically pointed\npayees to the correct branch. DNSSEC may have some issues but, AFAIK,\nit's as the easiest way to bootstrap identity to a common, reasonably\nsecure standard.\n\n-- \n---\nDouglas Roark\nCryptocurrency, network security, travel, and art.\nhttps://onename.com/droark\njoroark at vt.edu\nPGP key ID: 26623924\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 895 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20171130/ee8ac2e0/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "41091790b36f72a515630f1674b26374cf8018617854525e070d8d0c7c522feaeb838ebcc33c9c8910ddce0944eae9c896b66e990686f9224edebe0a42438e88"
}