Jack Smith’s new brief has a few things to say about Trump’s pet judge, Aileen Cannon:
She “erred.” She “deviated from binding Supreme Court precedent.” She “misconstrued the statutes.” Her reading was “misguided.” She “likewise erred. She “was wrong.” She “compounded [her] error.” She “relied on a flawed textual analysis.” Her reasoning “lacks merit.” Her conclusion “finds no support in text, context, history, or common sense.”
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.87822/gov.uscourts.ca11.87822.18.0_1.pdf
James Gleick /
npub1gs…twxft
2024-08-26 20:18:26
Author Public Key
npub1gsqxlu3pj34alvqauqpvwflw7q7xgm3mmzyjp8vdz3u9vxde425qttwxftPublished at
2024-08-26 20:18:26Event JSON
{
"id": "53bc5f5e85e46ac2a0fa03612d0a19620c48699bc2c1f8f79ba17e864a067df9",
"pubkey": "44006ff221946bdfb01de002c727eef03c646e3bd889209d8d14785619b9aaa8",
"created_at": 1724703506,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mas.to/users/gleick/statuses/113030168996051704",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Jack Smith’s new brief has a few things to say about Trump’s pet judge, Aileen Cannon:\n\nShe “erred.” She “deviated from binding Supreme Court precedent.” She “misconstrued the statutes.” Her reading was “misguided.” She “likewise erred. She “was wrong.” She “compounded [her] error.” She “relied on a flawed textual analysis.” Her reasoning “lacks merit.” Her conclusion “finds no support in text, context, history, or common sense.”\n\nhttps://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.87822/gov.uscourts.ca11.87822.18.0_1.pdf",
"sig": "89eb7953651ae2b3955aab406033fbf30661ba4eb06726c0a316ec92f0968a9d35938aa64d57a962dcb218469bfd6cca6123eba1051ef235c51d1ae7e6508578"
}