📅 Original date posted:2017-03-26
📝 Original message:On 3/26/2017 1:22 PM, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> With a tightening of the rule set, a hash power minority that has
> not upgraded will not produce a minority branch; instead they will
> simply have any invalid blocks they produce orphaned, serving as a
> wake-up call to upgrade.
>
>
> False. With bip9-based soft-fork-based activation of segwit, miner
> blocks will not be orphaned unless they are intentionally
> segwit-invalid (which they currently are not). If you have told miners
> otherwise, let me know.
>
A reasonable miner automatically checks every transaction seen, to see
if it might be valid with his own outputs substituted.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170326/b69b2b03/attachment-0001.html>;
Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ms…pmwjy
2023-06-07 17:57:51
in reply to nevent1q…drhm
Author Public Key
npub1msef5qkfwz4t7qacwxz775wgdtlytph78g2g2z903x90874u263sypmwjyPublished at
2023-06-07 17:57:51Event JSON
{
"id": "5f42db66d4574a8abf3b2a4c1780ebe6cad8f24b399753e4af7ce6cf048c1af7",
"pubkey": "dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3",
"created_at": 1686160671,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8f27b0f2ce427ef28fdd158930556a4af440f4d5d3a81eefc4fcbd02c81912c0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2a2f35754842f50c48d5f41fcda6201f0e80da1e168872471f595d904a716369",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"82205f272f995d9be742779a3c19a2ae08522ca14824c3a3b01525fb5459161e"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-03-26\n📝 Original message:On 3/26/2017 1:22 PM, Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e \u003cmailto:bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e With a tightening of the rule set, a hash power minority that has\n\u003e not upgraded will not produce a minority branch; instead they will\n\u003e simply have any invalid blocks they produce orphaned, serving as a\n\u003e wake-up call to upgrade.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e False. With bip9-based soft-fork-based activation of segwit, miner\n\u003e blocks will not be orphaned unless they are intentionally\n\u003e segwit-invalid (which they currently are not). If you have told miners\n\u003e otherwise, let me know.\n\u003e\n\nA reasonable miner automatically checks every transaction seen, to see\nif it might be valid with his own outputs substituted.\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170326/b69b2b03/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "56c9f9bb93059eb5ee76a9f69141b749b3fd6caeaa055c89a7a29c744558a417fbd2c795d0ed6e694f1be63ab3d6a554fd3b4f074d865af7cfa2271a3ff96fff"
}