Event JSON
{
"id": "5f28b694164b4eb7e4844731a985c0dddf04b3f4a691421626682ee4890606f4",
"pubkey": "1a2dd5b3edcfb703bae304949a8efb2fc3e36152cf4fda681b23880e6d764c6a",
"created_at": 1710776611,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"2b4a17d79532490690aa4930e2d7d21e3b13332a44e1de1210b8b2e333623b77",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"0ecc4e999a6ece69b4a5c1de90118b96e1b0e8e863d5a5b489810557bdeb5d9f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"31913e92ae248f7f8b612747b8499b8a01ae23dd6892dc35f35b8fdcdd7be40a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.sciences.re/users/zimoun/statuses/112117456032999238",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub19d9p04u4xfysdy92fycw947jrca3xve2gnsauysshzewxvmz8dms6kf02p This minimization looks like a part of a complete \"technology system\" as defined by Ellul's book https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Technological_Society\n\nIt's a paradoxical position: a tool (e.g., proposals) is first designed as a mean to make a situation more efficient, then this tool becomes a complete system that transforms \"itself\" as inefficient.\n\nThe question is thus: how to design a tool that avoids the paradox? Maybe Illich's book sketches ideas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tools_for_Conviviality",
"sig": "9c07dece1b97473e7418521b6b5bbb13837eac11a951d73848ab9e822774cb4cb0f9baa84fce475624f58ee31279fff14313f47e4673366c98b6bc20e9751433"
}