📅 Original date posted:2015-08-28
📝 Original message:On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Matt Whitlock <bip at mattwhitlock.name> wrote:
>> However, this proposal currently fails to answer a very important question:
>>
>> • What is the mechanism for activation of the new consensus rule? It is when a certain percentage of the blocks mined in a 2016-block retargeting period contain valid block-size votes?
>
> I chose not to address hard fork methodology at this stage because I
> wanted to focus on the main algorithm. There are a number of options
> open to us for deployment including a simple fixed activation (which I
> think is feasible because there is a a lot of awareness and the
> industry shows they are willing to rally around a single proposal). If
> there are any strong preferences, I can add a deployment section
> although I think it's less interesting until we forge a clear way
> forward with what blocksize proposal to use.
Can we please not discuss an ideal deployment mechanism in 4+
different proposals and discuss the same deployment mechanism (for all
proposals) in BIP99's thread instead?
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 15:49:23
in reply to nevent1q…074q
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 15:49:23Event JSON
{
"id": "5d7c1f8fb864b809f7374b51f09e01b8acc037193194003c35c43f1e739085ed",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686152963,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"56b0adbf3d1d3d1065cfb99fb9d090666fd73ffb1d30c585af39837300065d3f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a10e8be2902fd72d8e64b80a6100355fbecf3ba130e18424e0ca0a6c0497604e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-28\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Matt Whitlock \u003cbip at mattwhitlock.name\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e However, this proposal currently fails to answer a very important question:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e • What is the mechanism for activation of the new consensus rule? It is when a certain percentage of the blocks mined in a 2016-block retargeting period contain valid block-size votes?\n\u003e\n\u003e I chose not to address hard fork methodology at this stage because I\n\u003e wanted to focus on the main algorithm. There are a number of options\n\u003e open to us for deployment including a simple fixed activation (which I\n\u003e think is feasible because there is a a lot of awareness and the\n\u003e industry shows they are willing to rally around a single proposal). If\n\u003e there are any strong preferences, I can add a deployment section\n\u003e although I think it's less interesting until we forge a clear way\n\u003e forward with what blocksize proposal to use.\n\nCan we please not discuss an ideal deployment mechanism in 4+\ndifferent proposals and discuss the same deployment mechanism (for all\nproposals) in BIP99's thread instead?",
"sig": "b88c47a0c756249066346cad5adde1a960df19a93410c76c68548419f52e2ce2ec8531e7f1f3b6a3d9f1449e3b01a99bdab359c3e8258b3bd90d1ef19378acbc"
}