📅 Original date posted:2018-01-18
📝 Original message:All the more reason to only use the most common words that meet the other
criteria:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki#Wordlist
I agree - keeping "satoshi" in there is an unnecessary security risk.
Kind Regards,
Jonathan Sterling
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:14 AM, CryptAxe via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Why wouldn't they just test the frequency of words from the wordlist in
> entirety?
>
> On Jan 17, 2018 5:10 PM, "Weiwu Zhang via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev at lists.
> linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> 2018-01-09 19:20 GMT+08:00 Ronald van der Meer via bitcoin-dev
>> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
>> > After reviewing some bitcoin improvement proposals, I noticed that one
>> of the words that can be found on the BIP39 English wordlist is “satoshi”.
>> > I suggest removing this word from the list so it’s less obvious that
>> it’s a bitcoin seed when found by a malicious third party.
>>
>> If a malicious third party discovers a word list that look like a
>> seed, they would try using it as Bitcoin seed first anyway, with or
>> without finding the word 'satoshi' in it. The security threat is that
>> a malicious third party may index what they found and test every
>> occurrence of 'satoshi' for a lead to a seed.
>>
>> For example, a hard-disk recycling service would add this word to
>> their salvage tools. Any successfully hacked gmail account will be
>> 'satoshi' tested too.
>>
>> So I see this as a reasonable improvement:)
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--
Kind Regards,
Jonathan Sterling
+44 (0)7415 512691
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180118/de50dfb5/attachment.html>;
Jonathan Sterling [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…w8nel
2023-06-07 18:09:36
in reply to nevent1q…49xu
Author Public Key
npub1m2p5lyp8j2yt2x2qwldmrqsnac6lmm7dvnpdm7yxtdfmd5fa37xshw8nelSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 18:09:36Event JSON
{
"id": "5d145566aef22891627016e295b7ac6b783a3fc91881d46572baa8a62d42af71",
"pubkey": "da834f90279288b5194077dbb18213ee35fdefcd64c2ddf8865b53b6d13d8f8d",
"created_at": 1686161376,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"af95054b4a9851c4be8011ad5ba948392ace95a3f2a3e739e6cb49fac5454419",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8dcac3107e47b6137adbb0604a8eb4e8d83f8dc45b59226ae3146e909d06fc5d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"507d21660d41ec66a0e3e486a78a7369f474a388c0acebd70433bba44cd2a40d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-01-18\n📝 Original message:All the more reason to only use the most common words that meet the other\ncriteria:\nhttps://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki#Wordlist\n\nI agree - keeping \"satoshi\" in there is an unnecessary security risk.\n\nKind Regards,\n\nJonathan Sterling\n\nOn Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:14 AM, CryptAxe via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Why wouldn't they just test the frequency of words from the wordlist in\n\u003e entirety?\n\u003e\n\u003e On Jan 17, 2018 5:10 PM, \"Weiwu Zhang via bitcoin-dev\" \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.\n\u003e linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e 2018-01-09 19:20 GMT+08:00 Ronald van der Meer via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e After reviewing some bitcoin improvement proposals, I noticed that one\n\u003e\u003e of the words that can be found on the BIP39 English wordlist is “satoshi”.\n\u003e\u003e \u003e I suggest removing this word from the list so it’s less obvious that\n\u003e\u003e it’s a bitcoin seed when found by a malicious third party.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e If a malicious third party discovers a word list that look like a\n\u003e\u003e seed, they would try using it as Bitcoin seed first anyway, with or\n\u003e\u003e without finding the word 'satoshi' in it. The security threat is that\n\u003e\u003e a malicious third party may index what they found and test every\n\u003e\u003e occurrence of 'satoshi' for a lead to a seed.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e For example, a hard-disk recycling service would add this word to\n\u003e\u003e their salvage tools. Any successfully hacked gmail account will be\n\u003e\u003e 'satoshi' tested too.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e So I see this as a reasonable improvement:)\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\n\n-- \nKind Regards,\n\nJonathan Sterling\n+44 (0)7415 512691\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180118/de50dfb5/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "7f7e3e83bbc4db2ae267d4242a7c13416479fae2700705a9bf90fb1c03eb162f71709940e04e8fb0203d947a0252398db0ea64d89ba4d44691151cf4d64ed0a1"
}