OSNews on Nostr: “Why does part of the Windows 98 Setup program look older than the rest?” Well, ...
Published at
2024-04-10 15:02:49Event JSON
{
"id": "5d3f0f81eaf94961ed090f339e57cdb1dee4550d10188cc1b973708f2fd3f1e8",
"pubkey": "c2115c9b5302392092cdcda8bad3cee5368f0ce09a01737c8b39b011f453836f",
"created_at": 1712761369,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"Windows"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mstdn.social/users/osnews/statuses/112247529119092357",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "“Why does part of the Windows 98 Setup program look older than the rest?”\n\nWell, this is something I never knew. Over on the retrocomputing section of StackExchange, someone asked why the second phase of the Windows 98 installation looked decidedly different from the third phase, even though they're both graphical phases (the first phase is textual). The answer t\n\nhttps://www.osnews.com/story/139231/why-does-part-of-the-windows-98-setup-program-look-older-than-the-rest/\n\n#Windows",
"sig": "f46ae437380e65f903074868e70f9b81e7af55880b993f79bdeca97fbcf25a01925f3eeb51880b187112df759ab24ce62b01733abe6b004f0d212946247f6cb1"
}