Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) on Nostr: "And there’s another risk, too: Rules that are too onerous could quash innovation ...
"And there’s another risk, too: Rules that are too onerous could quash innovation that might yield benefits for patients if it can make care better, cheaper and more equitable."
Sorry, but no. So-called "AI" in medical settings is vastly under-regulated.
"might yield benefits" "might be more equitable": It must be on companies to show that they have created something safe and effective BEFORE putting it in front of patients & providers. Period.
Published at
2023-11-15 14:26:33Event JSON
{
"id": "5a7cad52094d74de1bdec1e1f0d155880dd658528ab1fafc1b2cb02578cbf214",
"pubkey": "13ec9fd5058a18cd097d105fd6ef43759e37d5915b1c01ed36acf0ef5a3e6f2a",
"created_at": 1700058393,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d7b4f46a43534a5b7a35b024394b75c8b6e46e28907b2ee3e421215bea238a2c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://dair-community.social/users/emilymbender/statuses/111415026864852944",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "\"And there’s another risk, too: Rules that are too onerous could quash innovation that might yield benefits for patients if it can make care better, cheaper and more equitable.\"\n\nSorry, but no. So-called \"AI\" in medical settings is vastly under-regulated. \n\n\"might yield benefits\" \"might be more equitable\": It must be on companies to show that they have created something safe and effective BEFORE putting it in front of patients \u0026 providers. Period.",
"sig": "e087db0e9e3ecf3653c0666d73fabd8340f8df4cdba46026c4fadccdaa455c6b18821fa48210abc67e0b75efc2b83542da920519fe558e7589fd4102915b8598"
}