What is the coherent argument other than the gaslighting addressed below:
- "if a message is valid wrt a protocol it can't be spam" (laugh in SMTP)
- "if a message entailed any cost to send once it can't be spam" (laugh in call-center setup investment)
- "spam isn't even possible to define in the first place" (laugh in 40 years of common sense)
- "refusing to download and relay some information to/from your node is censorship thus against Bitcoin ethos" (laugh in consensus rules)
- "Bitcoin Core never used mempool policies to filter unwanted transactions" (laugh in about 12 years of Core history starting from Satoshi)
- "Mempool filters never managed to increase the cost of spam" (laugh in logical consistency with the statement below)
- "By incentivizing OoB payments or UTxOset bloat, mempool filters are actually harming the network" (laugh in logical consistency with the statement above)
- "Bitcoin Core developers are always necessarily well-meaning and questioning that is in itself evil" (laugh in adversarial thinking)
- "Whoever doesn't unconditionally agree with all the statement above must necessarily be an ignorant noob misled by evil Twitter influencers"
?
nicnym
npub1jr…lpnqf
2025-05-19 22:16:11
in reply to nevent1q…56jf
Author Public Key
npub1jr4jqdjwag3uxg9h2prkkdnh9df530efvrgddw55zgu62ak2x9gqylpnqfPublished at
2025-05-19 22:16:11Event JSON
{
"id": "5acf05e1c78439ee85d945fd60a21bde593b20d298ca55207dc3c95bfc05f00d",
"pubkey": "90eb20364eea23c320b750476b36772b5348bf2960d0d6ba941239a576ca3150",
"created_at": 1747692971,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"664ff151abfaa44ef2fe9dfca242bc77ad05efe112056122e53c7888c1324000",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4c6ff7984e1fcf7dd492fb9532511a22583dd19a86351ea0fa21cc13bbf61f15",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5143c373df1b548a77d79ec74f27255d129b695b522dfb5bf43498ba4b501df9"
],
[
"p",
"4535551a40271b059ab92b71e7ab7e8700061a2d91b0d20f313ef82f052eb085"
],
[
"p",
"7bf6ff89bea850d9b2d1851f9063219882bcc07a473eddaa977715d2aa3cc99f"
],
[
"p",
"90eb20364eea23c320b750476b36772b5348bf2960d0d6ba941239a576ca3150"
],
[
"p",
"50d94fc2d8580c682b071a542f8b1e31a200b0508bab95a33bef0855df281d63"
]
],
"content": "What is the coherent argument other than the gaslighting addressed below: \n\n- \"if a message is valid wrt a protocol it can't be spam\" (laugh in SMTP)\n\n- \"if a message entailed any cost to send once it can't be spam\" (laugh in call-center setup investment)\n\n- \"spam isn't even possible to define in the first place\" (laugh in 40 years of common sense)\n\n- \"refusing to download and relay some information to/from your node is censorship thus against Bitcoin ethos\" (laugh in consensus rules)\n\n- \"Bitcoin Core never used mempool policies to filter unwanted transactions\" (laugh in about 12 years of Core history starting from Satoshi)\n\n- \"Mempool filters never managed to increase the cost of spam\" (laugh in logical consistency with the statement below)\n\n- \"By incentivizing OoB payments or UTxOset bloat, mempool filters are actually harming the network\" (laugh in logical consistency with the statement above)\n\n- \"Bitcoin Core developers are always necessarily well-meaning and questioning that is in itself evil\" (laugh in adversarial thinking)\n\n- \"Whoever doesn't unconditionally agree with all the statement above must necessarily be an ignorant noob misled by evil Twitter influencers\"\n\n? ",
"sig": "a2b8286a9adefd65316be6134d731c12b0b61bcf02b6748707ff52936e4bf8fc6dc0e5e40e6849ab117858b02c01d7214173fe36de92e8862eecb0d31082b73f"
}