Jorge TimĂłn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: đź“… Original date posted:2015-06-20 đź“ť Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at ...
đź“… Original date posted:2015-06-20
đź“ť Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo at gmail.com> wrote:
> If we want a non-repudiation mechanism in the protocol, we should explicitly define one rather than relying on “prima facie” assumptions. Otherwise, I would recommend not relying on the existence of a signed transaction as proof of intent to pay…
Non-repudiation can be built on top of the payment protocol layer.
Published at
2023-06-07 15:39:09Event JSON
{
"id": "5aa2794117d9b3fb5642a272dfadbcc73f9aac75172f471e100d60407410e7e5",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686152349,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b4025f674cbd304cabd44490b09b3ceb927f752f6a9f4513b25fefc95bdc008",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"42633c9c409f7a32d1930cabd10c8b3d3178c0fda52672a5f8b876a8aad0bb39",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"46986f86b97cc97829a031b03209644d134b939d0163375467f0b1363e0d875e"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-20\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Eric Lombrozo \u003celombrozo at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e If we want a non-repudiation mechanism in the protocol, we should explicitly define one rather than relying on “prima facie” assumptions. Otherwise, I would recommend not relying on the existence of a signed transaction as proof of intent to pay…\n\nNon-repudiation can be built on top of the payment protocol layer.",
"sig": "f2739b968a4f586b517ef3679ec7f871b0cacdae28cc4b97bc36efd6f5bd6648a00adee1194ebf2b483b9fcda2ba618697cefbd386cf4fd8a763ed2e25cb80af"
}