📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21
📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see
> various pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single
> place.
> This is for the community to have a coherent view about what you are talking
> about now spread into reddit/mailing/forums.
>
> If you did not analyzed a proposal yet, you don't have to fill out your
> opinion veto or approval.
> It is only to show what you would you "approve" and what you would "veto",
> after your analysis.
> Then point out all the discussions in the opinion section that lead you to
> your conclusion.
>
> You can change edit your position as you progress into your analysis and as
> new BIP get redacted.
> I'm eager to include the new proposals.
The most important part that developers should complete is the
"Technical Opinion" column section where they can explain their
general worldview, what their concerns are, how those concerns would
be alleviated. If one is undecided or does not have enough information
regarding each BIP then dont fill it out. That also helps signal the
level of consensus for a proposal.
As it stands at the moment, it's almost impossible to direct someone
at the opinion of a specific developer other than hunting down a few
gems scattered to the four corners of the universe. I tried recently
and it was simply impossible. At least with this system, specific BIPs
aside, we can easily see the view of each developer. I think most of
us can comment on BIP101 since the BIP appears non-negotiable.
The XT faction are easily winning the media war by obscuring rational
debate by high signal to noise ratio. Nicolas' solution means the most
important views expressed by each heavyweight will not get lost and
serve as a good reference point for everyone, including the media.
The site could be extended to include major stakeholders too like
major service providers (think exchanges, wallet providers etc) and
mining pools.
Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1lh…zg7ed
2023-06-07 15:48:22
in reply to nevent1q…z5y0
Author Public Key
npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7edSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:48:22Event JSON
{
"id": "5ae7573c55e49a07dbf0df26c6ec625a0c958bcb49a5d0ab1e8434df62540f45",
"pubkey": "fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83",
"created_at": 1686152902,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"81612a52e56fa005f6bed2cd04b516c7f082f0037e6ded416072f80ed9714e09",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"35263ea64b7f2ae3858da6ef0fe9003a5798dbc562bbdd13458b5c1076f3eaab",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"bf0548dc0ad239e9e1e0bba3c969632ded402a68091cde1b21a0895e90bc9a57"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see\n\u003e various pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single\n\u003e place.\n\u003e This is for the community to have a coherent view about what you are talking\n\u003e about now spread into reddit/mailing/forums.\n\u003e\n\u003e If you did not analyzed a proposal yet, you don't have to fill out your\n\u003e opinion veto or approval.\n\u003e It is only to show what you would you \"approve\" and what you would \"veto\",\n\u003e after your analysis.\n\u003e Then point out all the discussions in the opinion section that lead you to\n\u003e your conclusion.\n\u003e\n\u003e You can change edit your position as you progress into your analysis and as\n\u003e new BIP get redacted.\n\u003e I'm eager to include the new proposals.\n\nThe most important part that developers should complete is the\n\"Technical Opinion\" column section where they can explain their\ngeneral worldview, what their concerns are, how those concerns would\nbe alleviated. If one is undecided or does not have enough information\nregarding each BIP then dont fill it out. That also helps signal the\nlevel of consensus for a proposal.\n\nAs it stands at the moment, it's almost impossible to direct someone\nat the opinion of a specific developer other than hunting down a few\ngems scattered to the four corners of the universe. I tried recently\nand it was simply impossible. At least with this system, specific BIPs\naside, we can easily see the view of each developer. I think most of\nus can comment on BIP101 since the BIP appears non-negotiable.\n\nThe XT faction are easily winning the media war by obscuring rational\ndebate by high signal to noise ratio. Nicolas' solution means the most\nimportant views expressed by each heavyweight will not get lost and\nserve as a good reference point for everyone, including the media.\n\nThe site could be extended to include major stakeholders too like\nmajor service providers (think exchanges, wallet providers etc) and\nmining pools.",
"sig": "85965702b6498eb912ea1fede07ee85364a8f21d3de34a744b861014e88bf31ff477276db557d6c529de7eabbd7608eb964d4826f318f18a04dd842d0d52c645"
}