š
Original date posted:2016-05-13
š Original message:On 13/05/16 15:16, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 2) Define a new derivation path, parallel to Bip44, but a different 'purpose' (eg. <BipNumber-of-this-BIP>' instead of 44'). Let the user choose which account he want to add ("Normal account", "Witness account").
We had quite a long discussion in our team some time ago and we agreed
on that option #2 is much better and we'd like to implement this way in
myTREZOR.
> +) Wallet needs only to take care of 1 address per public key
True, if this BIP only supports P2WPKH.
P2WSH should probably be handled by another account type and another
BIP, anyway.
> Has any Bip44 compliant wallet already done any integration at this point?
We have something in the pipeline, but no visible results yet.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol "stick" Rusnak
SatoshiLabs.com
Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1wcā¦3hnuq
2023-06-07 17:50:40
in reply to nevent1qā¦6wpz
Author Public Key
npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuqPublished at
2023-06-07 17:50:40Event JSON
{
"id": "58b39138cfcddaa4360f1770dc63deb31faba4850d50020f372cb469725847f2",
"pubkey": "7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63",
"created_at": 1686160240,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dde2d1a2608d8708981e63f6426a506001e25543a593f3cfcddbdaafeb9e6b7d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f02c83336097196c304b89a62cacd795cf38f4b3143bdd350153d59a55d3374e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"bb4ce56ff7b2b187b434598f9aed542e3b855d5b9b4f7f6c0e5e0c7a8b9faae2"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2016-05-13\nš Original message:On 13/05/16 15:16, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e 2) Define a new derivation path, parallel to Bip44, but a different 'purpose' (eg. \u003cBipNumber-of-this-BIP\u003e' instead of 44'). Let the user choose which account he want to add (\"Normal account\", \"Witness account\"). \n\nWe had quite a long discussion in our team some time ago and we agreed\non that option #2 is much better and we'd like to implement this way in\nmyTREZOR.\n\n\u003e \t+) Wallet needs only to take care of 1 address per public key\n\nTrue, if this BIP only supports P2WPKH.\n\nP2WSH should probably be handled by another account type and another\nBIP, anyway.\n\n\u003e Has any Bip44 compliant wallet already done any integration at this point?\n\nWe have something in the pipeline, but no visible results yet.\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol \"stick\" Rusnak\nSatoshiLabs.com",
"sig": "10eee816761754a9112017836eb3608ea40efa8d322d018ea701e76bd155d6487ff7735c91d0689ac0e6f35d504ed85ead3559c79fcd1cef94b9f6dca18a23b0"
}