Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-11-05 📝 Original message:On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-11-05
📝 Original message:On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> Ok, then my point is that "signature malleability" is not particularly
> problematic or interesting alone, and the only way to get a practically-useful
> solution, is to address all kinds of malleability.
I disagree. Segregated witnesses, for example, doesn't solve all kinds
of malleability and is very useful in some practical cases by solving
all signature malleability.
As said, we don't want to eliminate all forms of malleability (for
example, replace by fee), although we may want to "address them" at
some level.
As you have said, wallets should be looking at scriptPubKeys, not
transaction ID, but that is orthogonal to SW, a normalized tx ID and
signature malleability.
Published at
2023-06-07 17:44:08Event JSON
{
"id": "554b4b8951e9dd74ab966ec1671b7a97acc4a22a7ea73cd0d4b5ac00477ef604",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159848,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"59e25977e31b6de547dc99825f6bc9fc8d0d57f8dc5978611471ad70444e93b2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6cdb135b095b4d47194fbb88328fe159b6ff499b74507651049ff5b99d193439",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-11-05\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Luke Dashjr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Ok, then my point is that \"signature malleability\" is not particularly\n\u003e problematic or interesting alone, and the only way to get a practically-useful\n\u003e solution, is to address all kinds of malleability.\n\nI disagree. Segregated witnesses, for example, doesn't solve all kinds\nof malleability and is very useful in some practical cases by solving\nall signature malleability.\nAs said, we don't want to eliminate all forms of malleability (for\nexample, replace by fee), although we may want to \"address them\" at\nsome level.\nAs you have said, wallets should be looking at scriptPubKeys, not\ntransaction ID, but that is orthogonal to SW, a normalized tx ID and\nsignature malleability.",
"sig": "01bda6105fcc65f4a67adcbf27cbc04fb6a173a3b27cfa9b7a7250e1bf2f37f4af3df8252243007bc5754870d01466f126aa2dfddc1f49f5abf62d8763141039"
}