📅 Original date posted:2013-06-04
📝 Original message:On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Adam Back <adam at cypherspace.org> wrote:
> d) some new standardized spend to fees (only miners can claim).
> so if I understand what you proposed d) seems like a useful concept if that
> is not currently possible. eg alternatively could we not just propose a
> standard recognized address that clearly no-one knows the EC discrete log
> of?
I'm one of the people experimenting in this area. I've long argued
that a zero-output transaction should be permitted -- 100% miner fee
-- as an elegant proof of sacrifice. Unfortunately that requires a
hard fork. Also, for most people, it seems likely that a change
transaction would be generated. That, then, would generate an
already-standard transaction, where inputs > outputs.
--
Jeff Garzik
Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] /
npub1kf…f3f58
2023-06-07 15:02:38
in reply to nevent1q…lp5t
Author Public Key
npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58Published at
2023-06-07 15:02:38Event JSON
{
"id": "57b0664db5275c4b3429f81d637070a7328a8b5f3ed6e5bd0534a01c23e0ee45",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686150158,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6bd9512be4afa2a81b307b24d258a963f9abe4599b255899b627408b516854f9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"11c0e0af3a10e1991546100f76a8a23137775d4cd64823d6a35b40562e357218",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ee0fa66772f633411e4432e251cfb15b1c0fe8cd8befd8b0d86eb302402a8b4a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-06-04\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Adam Back \u003cadam at cypherspace.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e d) some new standardized spend to fees (only miners can claim).\n\n\u003e so if I understand what you proposed d) seems like a useful concept if that\n\u003e is not currently possible. eg alternatively could we not just propose a\n\u003e standard recognized address that clearly no-one knows the EC discrete log\n\u003e of?\n\nI'm one of the people experimenting in this area. I've long argued\nthat a zero-output transaction should be permitted -- 100% miner fee\n-- as an elegant proof of sacrifice. Unfortunately that requires a\nhard fork. Also, for most people, it seems likely that a change\ntransaction would be generated. That, then, would generate an\nalready-standard transaction, where inputs \u003e outputs.\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nSenior Software Engineer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/",
"sig": "a346487b88f01991c9392c9f6a9a60097cf27e5573346c40ade87628448be845409423b843689bde24d696d30d999a1c655b8575527ede162f8f9869079dc7a1"
}