📅 Original date posted:2022-07-23
📝 Original message:+1 I'd participate.
Certain human/organizational limitations prevent things being said in
logged channels that sometimes can be shared in person. Sometimes
people break through misunderstandings in person, through either
informal mingling or the use of Chatham House rules. So I would also
advocate restarting the Scaling Bitcoin conferences, twice a year.
One request for the agenda:
I perceived a lot of "Oh, well it's also fine to just wait and see
what comes" in the prior discussions. The idea that we should reopen
this discussion presumes that it is better to not wait, because having
even imperfect covenant designs will cause the ecosystem to explore
what use cases to allocate developer interest in (as long as the fees
are not too far off - yeah I'm looking at you, CSFS). Because of
this, I also propose asking some of the more advanced scripting
technologists to reveal what of their work is currently science, what
is engineering, and what is product-oriented with understandable
delivery dates. I think that if more people understood the answers to
these questions then there would be more room for incremental
exploration of the space.
Ryan Grant [ARCHIVE] /
npub19a…6mwcl
2023-06-07 23:12:02
in reply to nevent1q…aans
Author Public Key
npub19a2m7qm80t7mzhgqfgunswhm5c3q4fkqt89057ugy7u8jdxncf2q06mwclPublished at
2023-06-07 23:12:02Event JSON
{
"id": "711944dbcd5adde515b2924b6581581f6c01d30c78821a9e0cf1f2a73eb4944f",
"pubkey": "2f55bf03677afdb15d004a39383afba6220aa6c059cafa7b8827b87934d3c254",
"created_at": 1686179522,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"32278431461b2aef74d3e0bd3f2c67c0cb2a1196ed72c760c4d2cf2b42931ee2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cc0de06c051076460a294a2dae369424d0fc3a8f7b3ed37d39491672b0f975b8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6485bc56963b51c9043d0855cca9f78fcbd0ce135a195c3f969e18ca54a0d551"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-07-23\n📝 Original message:+1 I'd participate.\n\nCertain human/organizational limitations prevent things being said in\nlogged channels that sometimes can be shared in person. Sometimes\npeople break through misunderstandings in person, through either\ninformal mingling or the use of Chatham House rules. So I would also\nadvocate restarting the Scaling Bitcoin conferences, twice a year.\n\nOne request for the agenda:\nI perceived a lot of \"Oh, well it's also fine to just wait and see\nwhat comes\" in the prior discussions. The idea that we should reopen\nthis discussion presumes that it is better to not wait, because having\neven imperfect covenant designs will cause the ecosystem to explore\nwhat use cases to allocate developer interest in (as long as the fees\nare not too far off - yeah I'm looking at you, CSFS). Because of\nthis, I also propose asking some of the more advanced scripting\ntechnologists to reveal what of their work is currently science, what\nis engineering, and what is product-oriented with understandable\ndelivery dates. I think that if more people understood the answers to\nthese questions then there would be more room for incremental\nexploration of the space.",
"sig": "daa55a7c379c8fbb8cb0d93aab4162176680f2e5faaab25c3b48cafa0d90e440a0cc2814b5b27a4b41e67ecabe3158020d1dbc5dd286aeebfb44ffa54a13bd62"
}