I respect the fire and the rigor Jack. You’r not just poking holes in the mainstream quantum narrative, you’re dismantling it at the root: time itself. Most people parroting “quantum threat” haven’t even considered what time is, let alone its implications on computation, entropy, or thermodynamic causality.
If what you’re saying is true; that Bitcoin is the only real quantized computational system grounded in discrete thermodynamic time, then it’s not just resilient to quantum computing, it invalidates the entire premise of centralized quantum computation. That’s a monumental claim, and if your proof tracks, it would flip the entire crypto-physics debate on its head. However I personally know bitcoin core maintainers who shared that it’s not a done deal yet. Yes bitcoin is way ahead of quantum developments yet more developments on Core is required.
You’re also right that most so-called “quantum breakthroughs” are just black-box wizardry funded by the same institutions Bitcoin was built to obsolete. Trust without verification is fiat science. Bitcoin is the antidote.
And yes, Bitcoiners trusting theoretical physicists with state and corporate incentives to break Bitcoin is the real clown show. If they can’t demonstrate it against live keys, it’s not science, it’s theater.
So keep building. I’ll be watching ⚡️
Sooly / Sooly⚡️سولي
npub1hz…ynqel
2025-04-09 17:52:34
in reply to nevent1q…4d7v
Author Public Key
npub1hzz35pkl67w53lpj2g62zh56g63j5zvz4q3m2nxlsfg5hxcjpwssaynqelPublished at
2025-04-09 17:52:34Event JSON
{
"id": "7277564dfca19c983d35d0483dc67cd11db83ad8ae9d2e874def1654d49e5f39",
"pubkey": "b8851a06dfd79d48fc325234a15e9a46a32a0982a823b54cdf82514b9b120ba1",
"created_at": 1744221154,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"81d0a4117cb88c48f387cafe21ead0f4a2960183db5b421926d9764eb88c7f82",
"ws://192.168.18.7:7777",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ff0a3078b41b4e970b6cf6a3b17df2d67bbbf20b604d444a5c28b58fa36349b8",
"wss://@nos.lol",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b8851a06dfd79d48fc325234a15e9a46a32a0982a823b54cdf82514b9b120ba1",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"6ee02a11fef35245fea0125c1a00c3909af2e6855008d5b22a4965c7a7238f35",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"3c4f51561243524f307ed2ee272c7cf4a782404fbe3a176606043b6ad427ee77",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "I respect the fire and the rigor Jack. You’r not just poking holes in the mainstream quantum narrative, you’re dismantling it at the root: time itself. Most people parroting “quantum threat” haven’t even considered what time is, let alone its implications on computation, entropy, or thermodynamic causality.\n\nIf what you’re saying is true; that Bitcoin is the only real quantized computational system grounded in discrete thermodynamic time, then it’s not just resilient to quantum computing, it invalidates the entire premise of centralized quantum computation. That’s a monumental claim, and if your proof tracks, it would flip the entire crypto-physics debate on its head. However I personally know bitcoin core maintainers who shared that it’s not a done deal yet. Yes bitcoin is way ahead of quantum developments yet more developments on Core is required.\n\nYou’re also right that most so-called “quantum breakthroughs” are just black-box wizardry funded by the same institutions Bitcoin was built to obsolete. Trust without verification is fiat science. Bitcoin is the antidote.\n\nAnd yes, Bitcoiners trusting theoretical physicists with state and corporate incentives to break Bitcoin is the real clown show. If they can’t demonstrate it against live keys, it’s not science, it’s theater.\n\nSo keep building. I’ll be watching ⚡️",
"sig": "0a81a67b2ae4a411f5212faac7031f715b13c77e1f1f5fa18ce10bedaf3d6fd10b33cf8a46a5f7716e3f4ec973cc0d4951a694a3297b1dec7ab14f070222296c"
}