npub17a93lvl79m9crvwkkcglmgwqghdxzmkrllvyma7jdhl32k0th3fq4lmv9a (npub17a9…mv9a)
Right, because I’m viewing this based on the factual record, that’s public record in courts’ dockets, regardless of my personal preferences or outcomes.
When there’s a problem to fix it’s critical to correctly identify the problem, and when courts like SCOTUS are involved, the facts of the process are especially crucial.
So you’re glossing over critical facts in what you’re saying, getting the facts wrong, and that’s no minor detail.
Let’s say, for example, that you think a judge here was so in error that they need to be removed from office. Yes, that would be one way of addressing the problem BUT the it’s critical to know which judge to target.
It is no minor detail that you’re getting the facts of the case wrong even as you’re focusing on eventual outcomes.
npub1z9…g7jc5
2023-09-03 00:10:05
in reply to nevent1q…q0rk
Author Public Key
npub1z9nz50nu849nt8ucwtr0ssa4pyzkre30z6mzw9dpemjfq5ankypsug7jc5Published at
2023-09-03 00:10:05Event JSON
{
"id": "721eb39cbf9d1fe11ef0e0df5cc5668fbdb1759286a4c7182e1eec668b5df434",
"pubkey": "11662a3e7c3d4b359f9872c6f843b5090561e62f16b62715a1cee49053b3b103",
"created_at": 1693699805,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"f74b1fb3fe2ecb81b1d6b611fda1c045da616ec3ffd84df7d26dff1559ebbc52",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"dd68eff50891b20da793b02958cbe12c4b0865dda72acd63b870828f5e5ebdcb",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"5a43353a4501c7d7f4142806582353adc329cfb8289d7adb1710e68fbdf386ac",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://qoto.org/users/volkris/statuses/110998310455370318",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub17a93lvl79m9crvwkkcglmgwqghdxzmkrllvyma7jdhl32k0th3fq4lmv9a\n\nRight, because I’m viewing this based on the factual record, that’s public record in courts’ dockets, regardless of my personal preferences or outcomes.\n\nWhen there’s a problem to fix it’s critical to correctly identify the problem, and when courts like SCOTUS are involved, the facts of the process are especially crucial.\n\nSo you’re glossing over critical facts in what you’re saying, getting the facts wrong, and that’s no minor detail.\n\nLet’s say, for example, that you think a judge here was so in error that they need to be removed from office. Yes, that would be one way of addressing the problem BUT the it’s critical to know which judge to target.\n\nIt is no minor detail that you’re getting the facts of the case wrong even as you’re focusing on eventual outcomes.",
"sig": "9edcff024048dc889e4ea17c3660ee00e96b029cd3883f6c77275fcb0a5ee15c9f6ce4d0d39a2ed4ffddcdfb3121f1e595962110443d711b5cb202abd5f74180"
}