📅 Original date posted:2015-06-15
📝 Original message:On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
> * ACK on moving away from SourceForge mailing lists - though only once a
> community-welcomed replacement is up and running
>
> * ACK on using LF as a mailing infrastructure provider
>
> * Research secure mailing list models, for bitcoin-security. The list is
> not ultra high security - we all use PGP for that - but it would perhaps be
> nice to find some spiffy cryptosystem where mailing list participants
> individually hold keys & therefore access.
>
>
While I agree this is a good idea, this should not be a precondition for
moving the public bitcoin-dev list. The security team needs to separately
research/write tools needed for this.
<jgarzik> warren, wanna just go ahead and create bitcoin-development @ LF?
*More Feedback?* As for going ahead, perhaps we should wait to hear from
more of the other technical leaders?
*More Questions*
*List Name?* Would people prefer "bitcoin-development" for he new list
name instead of a shorter name like "bitcoin-dev"? I personally like the
shorter name, but either is fine.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo currently has
"sidechains-dev", and "lightning-dev" is moving there sometime soon.
*Proposed Cut-Off Date?* Then we also need to agree on a date to cut off
the old list. Their sysadmin said we could have the new list auto-post
from the old list for a short while. I wonder how well that works ... if
that will result in double posting if people write to the new and CC the
old list. Needs a little research how well it would behave to have both
lists operating during a transition period. I think we should announce a
cut-off date when posts to the old list is shut off, July 15th, one month
from now. Thoughts?
*Moderators?* Mailman on the new server allows having separate logins for
admins and moderators. I think the admins of the old SF project are gavin,
jgarzik and sipa... they are kind of busy. Perhaps we should identify
known trusted community members who can help with moderation. Usually this
is dealing with "held" messages that are flagged by the spam filter
Warren Togami
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150614/2768e0e1/attachment.html>;
Warren Togami Jr. [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s5…zxem8
2023-06-07 15:37:50
in reply to nevent1q…fw7e
Author Public Key
npub1s5p2xnl52ksr3a4qfa8re5znmja46ugm3x3ayy0x2c2mqrsw6ewsmzxem8Published at
2023-06-07 15:37:50Event JSON
{
"id": "76187248a297e74972803620295d0c154a19cf9e3c7ae68e1d95f4036395ef2e",
"pubkey": "8502a34ff455a038f6a04f4e3cd053dcbb5d711b89a3d211e65615b00e0ed65d",
"created_at": 1686152270,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"810d20bcf991f0775ab3cca311351e013d4d782191b318764a6f2045d4a0f082",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"03f6d6d1a8980fa309914a3a31756abcd48bf0f33b6d48b886c11d7a290d7f4f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-15\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e * ACK on moving away from SourceForge mailing lists - though only once a\n\u003e community-welcomed replacement is up and running\n\u003e\n\u003e * ACK on using LF as a mailing infrastructure provider\n\u003e\n\u003e * Research secure mailing list models, for bitcoin-security. The list is\n\u003e not ultra high security - we all use PGP for that - but it would perhaps be\n\u003e nice to find some spiffy cryptosystem where mailing list participants\n\u003e individually hold keys \u0026 therefore access.\n\u003e\n\u003e\nWhile I agree this is a good idea, this should not be a precondition for\nmoving the public bitcoin-dev list. The security team needs to separately\nresearch/write tools needed for this.\n\n\u003cjgarzik\u003e warren, wanna just go ahead and create bitcoin-development @ LF?\n\n\n*More Feedback?* As for going ahead, perhaps we should wait to hear from\nmore of the other technical leaders?\n\n*More Questions*\n\n*List Name?* Would people prefer \"bitcoin-development\" for he new list\nname instead of a shorter name like \"bitcoin-dev\"? I personally like the\nshorter name, but either is fine.\nhttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo currently has\n\"sidechains-dev\", and \"lightning-dev\" is moving there sometime soon.\n\n*Proposed Cut-Off Date?* Then we also need to agree on a date to cut off\nthe old list. Their sysadmin said we could have the new list auto-post\nfrom the old list for a short while. I wonder how well that works ... if\nthat will result in double posting if people write to the new and CC the\nold list. Needs a little research how well it would behave to have both\nlists operating during a transition period. I think we should announce a\ncut-off date when posts to the old list is shut off, July 15th, one month\nfrom now. Thoughts?\n\n*Moderators?* Mailman on the new server allows having separate logins for\nadmins and moderators. I think the admins of the old SF project are gavin,\njgarzik and sipa... they are kind of busy. Perhaps we should identify\nknown trusted community members who can help with moderation. Usually this\nis dealing with \"held\" messages that are flagged by the spam filter\n\nWarren Togami\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150614/2768e0e1/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9545f1b769f4ed2d55f67b4c81bf008e5e82dde9996ee0e699b54051e2862d60235b3e275198e1240081cc31b5fef897d32dd1c1be76088f3e6b44454520c970"
}