š
Original date posted:2011-07-27
šļø Summary of this message: Proposal to add a bounty feature to GitHub's bug tracker. Concerns raised about agreeing to GitHub's TOS and potential need for a separate bug tracker.
š Original message:As it's unlikely to be an automated system anyway, I do not see why
people claiming the bounties would need to agree with the GitHub TOS.
Besides which, I suspect most people contributing to bitcoin already
have agreed to it.
Although, if GitHub can't support the feature, it could be an argument
for setting up a bug tracker unrelated to GitHub.
- Joel
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 10:28 -0400, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:20:07 AM John Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen
> > <joel.kaartinen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Perhaps even add a way for anyone add to the bounty attached to a bug on
> > > the bug tracker? Also, a listing page for bugs with their bounties might
> > > be nice too.
> >
> > Good idea. I'm not sure if the github bug tracker supports extension
> > attributes, but it'd be a great place to add it. Also, people can let know
> > that they're already working on a feature using a comment, to prevent
> > double work.
>
> I'm not sure a few small bounties would justify agreeing to GitHub's steep
> demand for potentially unlimited money in their terms of service...
>
Joel Joonatan Kaartinen [ARCHIVE] /
npub165ā¦48xrx
2023-06-07 02:08:26
in reply to nevent1qā¦8ngu
Author Public Key
npub1654pkuj4rway0043gcu6rdh4umxescp7ew42d2czqvts3kwvg3esc48xrxPublished at
2023-06-07 02:08:26Event JSON
{
"id": "764f8a7fcb63b5072c73d240cfb4097f42fbc7ed0136158087c23111cf59e0c7",
"pubkey": "d52a1b72551bba47beb14639a1b6f5e6cd98603ecbaaa6ab02031708d9cc4473",
"created_at": 1686103706,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4352ebe3f7c6b3134c5393d65e142b2a2560baf788528a9d9aad63761b8a5bcc",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b0c086028a4e1bf71b807c2cd5c85b69d1bfd22c98d54ae93061412fed7a98da",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2011-07-27\nšļø Summary of this message: Proposal to add a bounty feature to GitHub's bug tracker. Concerns raised about agreeing to GitHub's TOS and potential need for a separate bug tracker.\nš Original message:As it's unlikely to be an automated system anyway, I do not see why\npeople claiming the bounties would need to agree with the GitHub TOS.\nBesides which, I suspect most people contributing to bitcoin already\nhave agreed to it.\n\nAlthough, if GitHub can't support the feature, it could be an argument\nfor setting up a bug tracker unrelated to GitHub.\n\n- Joel\n\nOn Wed, 2011-07-27 at 10:28 -0400, Luke-Jr wrote:\n\u003e On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:20:07 AM John Smith wrote:\n\u003e \u003e On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen \n\u003e \u003e \u003cjoel.kaartinen at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e Perhaps even add a way for anyone add to the bounty attached to a bug on\n\u003e \u003e \u003e the bug tracker? Also, a listing page for bugs with their bounties might\n\u003e \u003e \u003e be nice too.\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e Good idea. I'm not sure if the github bug tracker supports extension\n\u003e \u003e attributes, but it'd be a great place to add it. Also, people can let know\n\u003e \u003e that they're already working on a feature using a comment, to prevent\n\u003e \u003e double work.\n\u003e \n\u003e I'm not sure a few small bounties would justify agreeing to GitHub's steep \n\u003e demand for potentially unlimited money in their terms of service...\n\u003e",
"sig": "f9ef7a32e1d696c3d19e0fda53bf2b9178f6e67237c1fa9ac34a0143746789c01e354d11d51920b1a15701b30b910997bae2cb6a69b0ee138ed8087108db35c4"
}