📅 Original date posted:2022-07-26
📝 Original message:I know this might be a sort of repetition for a previous question, but I do
want to know from enthusiasts in this group that while Bitcoin was trading
at much lower price in its early days, 1 sat/vB was a good dust protection
measure. But now, I think it's a bit high for merely a dust protection
measure, and should be lowered slightly. Even if not, it should be lowered
to half when prices go double than today and keeps oscillating at that
point. As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just
needing support from full node operators. I support LN but I think
transaction affordability should remain constant in the future. If I'm okay
to wait in a queue, I should have the option for same affordability for
minimum fees in the future as it is today. (Like we still have posts today
while email still exists).
Awaiting your response.
Regards
Aaradhya Chauhan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220726/9e541b18/attachment.html>;
Aaradhya Chauhan [ARCHIVE] /
npub192…8n59j
2023-06-07 23:12:09
in reply to nevent1q…ka65
Author Public Key
npub192590432du8twp7qet9wyjdqxggrejz7n562va5znvqzrrx735ys78n59jPublished at
2023-06-07 23:12:09Event JSON
{
"id": "766e9d0d50c9dc719c218668117049b9f3e3a4e5bd0d1c6f7011574c9e699394",
"pubkey": "2aa857d62a6f0eb707c0cacae249a032103cc85e9d34a676829b00218cde8d09",
"created_at": 1686179529,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5d2e5e33951257609e634a8050253effbcdc80715de5454effa1da6b8afb71e8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-07-26\n📝 Original message:I know this might be a sort of repetition for a previous question, but I do\nwant to know from enthusiasts in this group that while Bitcoin was trading\nat much lower price in its early days, 1 sat/vB was a good dust protection\nmeasure. But now, I think it's a bit high for merely a dust protection\nmeasure, and should be lowered slightly. Even if not, it should be lowered\nto half when prices go double than today and keeps oscillating at that\npoint. As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just\nneeding support from full node operators. I support LN but I think\ntransaction affordability should remain constant in the future. If I'm okay\nto wait in a queue, I should have the option for same affordability for\nminimum fees in the future as it is today. (Like we still have posts today\nwhile email still exists).\n\nAwaiting your response.\n\nRegards\nAaradhya Chauhan\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220726/9e541b18/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "07cea1fcf1cc87b88bf4a0622f9757f53a66788629e9de732e63f3981094f26ab2427fdda05a7c374ccc9ed5ad49b2c5ed5c3ec3d56d717822be2be9747c62e1"
}