📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21
📝 Original message:I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize
debate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about
the current outstanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than
voting mechanism.
(ofcourse the author of the BIPs would "vote" for their own proposals.)
It would be good to include supporting and counter statements regards to
these BIPs on the site.
in addition to highlight certain things like pools in china have voiced
their opinion that increase should happen, and 8mb is something they are
comfortable with, which is not directly related to a single BIP, but never
the less relevant in this discussion.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak <btcdrak at gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
> ><bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat
> >models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the
> >blocksize.
> >
> >That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for.
>
> What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG
> AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH
> Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD
> seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl
> CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6
> JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ
> za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=
> =Jfl+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--
*Yifu Guo*
*"Life is an everlasting self-improvement."*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150821/0f577099/attachment.html>;
Yifu Guo [ARCHIVE] /
npub144…ttkf0
2023-06-07 15:48:24
in reply to nevent1q…z2t5
Author Public Key
npub144uewnt43hzv7xa7cmexaljalz6szep5haqvepz3eu4zxmjrhrvq5ttkf0Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:48:24Event JSON
{
"id": "7e5973d412c5352816b73a91ac59bf1a21931254ff7376334e0d67ebf48bc0dc",
"pubkey": "ad79974d758dc4cf1bbec6f26efe5df8b5016434bf40cc8451cf2a236e43b8d8",
"created_at": 1686152904,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"81612a52e56fa005f6bed2cd04b516c7f082f0037e6ded416072f80ed9714e09",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8f09ec88e649ad95b058f4862d45eeec728ecefc81cc9be34a23e59e9fe72a20",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21\n📝 Original message:I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize\ndebate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about\nthe current outstanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than\nvoting mechanism.\n (ofcourse the author of the BIPs would \"vote\" for their own proposals.)\n\nIt would be good to include supporting and counter statements regards to\nthese BIPs on the site.\nin addition to highlight certain things like pools in china have voiced\ntheir opinion that increase should happen, and 8mb is something they are\ncomfortable with, which is not directly related to a single BIP, but never\nthe less relevant in this discussion.\n\nOn Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\n\u003e Hash: SHA512\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak \u003cbtcdrak at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003eOn Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003e\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e\u003e What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat\n\u003e \u003emodels are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the\n\u003e \u003eblocksize.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003eThat's exactly what the \"Technical Opinion\" column is for.\n\u003e\n\u003e What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit.\n\u003e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\u003e\n\u003e iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG\n\u003e AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH\n\u003e Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD\n\u003e seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl\n\u003e CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6\n\u003e JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ\n\u003e za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI=\n\u003e =Jfl+\n\u003e -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\n\n\n-- \n*Yifu Guo*\n*\"Life is an everlasting self-improvement.\"*\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150821/0f577099/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "10af23309c66ffd73a25ccce68ef0619c694da938e072227e6811dc7c657ddcf626f4358ed1ce3c518a5c80e4739f61c0b13c35bfafb303631b78e29a656a595"
}