📅 Original date posted:2016-09-07
📝 Original message:Hello again,
sorry, got a bit derailed on that proposal.
But now I think its time to work on it again.
- Any objections to get a BIP-number for it?
If not, can I get one, so I can finish up the test vectors.
Current version: https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
- I decided against extending it for future P2WPKH addresses
I think that should be a separate account on its own, to reduce implementation work
for future wallets, that only want/need to implement P2WPKH accounts. And to keep it simple.
Was someone working on the P2WPKH address format in the meantime? (ie. alternative for [2])
- We will also need a extension to the BIP32 serialization format[1]
It should be possible to export/import a xPriv/xPub key across compatible wallets, and they
should be able without guesswork, fuzzy checks or asking the user to import the correct account type.
Thinking about some flexible tag-based backwards compatible extensions - but thats a different BIP in itself.
Cheers,
Daniel
[1] https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki#Serialization_format
[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0142.mediawiki
On 2016-06-14 17:41, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Following up to the discussion last month ( https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:
>
> https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
>
>
> Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet implement something different?
> If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.
>
> Thx,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
Daniel Weigl [ARCHIVE] /
npub1hd…tda79
2023-06-07 17:53:17
in reply to nevent1q…508f
Author Public Key
npub1hdxw2mlhk2cc0dp5tx8e4m259cac2h2mnd8h7mqwtcx84zul4t3qqtda79Published at
2023-06-07 17:53:17Event JSON
{
"id": "7e1e151635f65f82047fba9f57132be3e6d9be8535d5aa079f4dd46873dbd337",
"pubkey": "bb4ce56ff7b2b187b434598f9aed542e3b855d5b9b4f7f6c0e5e0c7a8b9faae2",
"created_at": 1686160397,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"08ea7fdf65d244f4563d9eb4cbb99bdb02f8058e0817885d49d5d0eb8c1aa919",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-09-07\n📝 Original message:Hello again,\n\nsorry, got a bit derailed on that proposal.\nBut now I think its time to work on it again.\n\n- Any objections to get a BIP-number for it? \n\tIf not, can I get one, so I can finish up the test vectors.\n\tCurrent version: https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki \n\n- I decided against extending it for future P2WPKH addresses\n\tI think that should be a separate account on its own, to reduce implementation work \n\tfor future wallets, that only want/need to implement P2WPKH accounts. And to keep it simple.\n\tWas someone working on the P2WPKH address format in the meantime? (ie. alternative for [2])\n\n- We will also need a extension to the BIP32 serialization format[1]\n\tIt should be possible to export/import a xPriv/xPub key across compatible wallets, and they\n\tshould be able without guesswork, fuzzy checks or asking the user to import the correct account type.\n\tThinking about some flexible tag-based backwards compatible extensions - but thats a different BIP in itself.\n\n\nCheers,\nDaniel\n\n\n[1] https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki#Serialization_format\n[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0142.mediawiki\n\nOn 2016-06-14 17:41, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Hi List,\n\u003e \n\u003e Following up to the discussion last month ( https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:\n\u003e \t\n\u003e \thttps://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet implement something different?\n\u003e If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.\n\u003e \n\u003e Thx,\n\u003e Daniel\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e",
"sig": "a9132d611818a69f9064a1532b5432831f94d0cce9b83159d3eb54c6f4057dfa86f026b3d4c692810f749db29feae6131743a3d0f7898012d95972664adc2871"
}